The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
His theories of evolution hold a different position. Darwin's theory
has now been so greatly modified, as much by his supporters as by
his opponents, that it cannot be said any longer to hold the field
as he first presented it; and Butler's attitude has been in a manner
justified. But this change has been accomplished not by the acceptance
of Butler's views but by the work of experimental biologists. He
did, in fact, offer many general principles, some well founded, some
mistaken, all stimulating, for the consideration of practical workers;
and it would not be possible to assert, without an exhaustive enquiry
into the history of the matter, that his writings have had no influence
on the development of science. But Charles Darwin and his followers
were practical men--men no doubt with faults, with the intolerance and
impatience of the laity that are often to be found in the scientific
investigator. It is not hard to see why they received Butler with
tepid interest, and finally ignored him when he forsook their path
of enquiry. For they did ignore him: they did not, as he supposed,
conspire to silence him. He seems to have believed that Darwin was a
sort of Anti-Christ malevolently determined to force on humanity a
diabolical belief of his own invention; and he was only too ready to
suspect him of unscrupulous dealing and machinations. When he conceived
that Darwin had engineered an attack on him, though he obtained an
expression of regret for an accident, he flung violently into print,
and did, though he remained ignorant of the fact, get from Darwin and
his friends the attention as an enemy which they would not bestow on
him as a scientist. His letter to the _Athenæum_ seriously perturbed
Darwin, who drafted two replies to it, and submitted them for advice to
the members of his family and to Professor Huxley. The advice given was
against replying; and Butler was accordingly confirmed in his opinion.
But this was an opinion which a less suspicious man would have been
slower in forming and readier to discard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account