The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
"Balmy. Don't you know that expression?" Helena, on the floor, with
her hands under her knees, watched her companion's looks with a grin.
"It's _our_ language now, you know--English--the language of us young
people. The old ones have got to learn it as we speak it."
Mrs. Ward would no doubt be shocked by a writer who delivered his, or
her, views on the French people with an obvious ignorance of the French
language. She would despise the affectation of an author who used
Latin tags incorrectly. But it is only fair to say that her views on
the younger generation are rendered slightly ridiculous by her obvious
ignorance of its idioms. She would perhaps have been better employed
in a detailed picture of the manners of 1913, a period to which she
doubtless looks back as to a lost paradise of decorous behaviour.
Mr. Galsworthy's _Saint's Progress_ suffers less from insufficient
documentation. His heroine Noel, with her short hair, is the daughter
of a clergyman, and follows the course gloomily foretold for so many
young girls during the war-period to the predestined end of bearing
a war-baby. She and her sister Gratian are forced by the pressure of
events to think and act for themselves. Gratian, safely married to a
doctor, delivers herself as follows:
"Dad," said Gratian suddenly, "we can only find out for ourselves,
even if we do singe our wings in doing it. We've been reading James's
_Pragmatism_. George says the only chapter that's important is
missing--the one on ethics, to show that what we do is not wrong till
it's proved wrong by the result. I suppose he was afraid to deliver
that lecture."
But, while Mr. Galsworthy is much superior to Mrs. Ward in the accuracy
of his information, he can hardly be said to be superior to her in
the justice and clearness of his presentation. The traits of his
persons are correctly observed and generalised, but they are not shown
through the medium of living individuals. We feel of Noel that many
girls of such a disposition found themselves in such circumstances and
behaved thus; and so far, regarded as a sociological study, the book
is deserving of praise. But what we never feel is that the individual
girl, Noel, ever existed; and by the deficiency it is condemned as a
novel. This book will be a serious disappointment to those who imagined
from _Five Tales_ that Mr. Galsworthy had recovered the original
freshness of his talent and was about to begin a new and a sincerer
period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account