The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
Medical research bears so directly on the well-being of every one of
us that it is astonishing that more people do not take an interest
in it. The existing indifference may be attributed partly to the
lack of good popular books describing recent advances in an easily
comprehensible way, partly to the nomenclature adopted by the medical
profession, which is apt to frighten the layman into imagining that
the exotic polysyllables in question can be used only for phenomena
of unimaginable complexity and obscurity. Complex they always are, of
course, with the complexity of all natural manifestations, but very
often the main lines of the problems which have arisen, and the methods
of attack, can be stated in plain language. The book before us, which
deals with the profoundly interesting subject of anaphylaxis, is not
avowedly written for the enlightenment of the public, yet it is in
most parts accessible to anybody with a slight knowledge of medicine,
and, not being a "popular" book, it has the advantage of being free
from the erroneous generalisations so often introduced in presenting
a branch of science to the lay reader. The subject is described as one
still in the course of development, and is not given that false air of
completion so dear to the populariser.
The phenomena of anaphylaxis are among the most striking in medical
science, and have only recently been investigated, for although
isolated cases of what we should now call anaphylaxis had been
previously noted, Richet was the first to show the significance and
extent of the subject in his memoir of 1902, in which he established
many of the most important points. The essence of anaphylaxis is that
the injection into an animal of a small quantity of one of certain
substances--which in some cases are, and in others are not, poisons
(with a poison the dose must, of course, be less than the fatal
one)--puts the animal in a particular sensitive state, so that a very
small second injection produces fatal results of a very violent and
well-marked character. Some time must elapse after the first injection
for the sensitive state to establish itself, and the second injection
must be of exactly the same nature as the first, this latter fact
constituting the so-called specificity of the anaphylactic effect.
This specificity has been applied for identifying blood of a doubtful
source, since an animal which has been sensitised with an injection
of blood from a given species is sensitive only to blood of the same
species. Further, the blood of an animal in the sensitive state can
be used to render another animal sensitive, a result known as passive
anaphylaxis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account