The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920 — John Shaqi
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
All this I mention, for what trifling value it may have, as a purely
external impression, since I never had the honour of speaking to the
lady or to Lewes. We had, my wife and I, common friends in the gifted
family of Simcox--Edith Simcox (who wrote ingeniously and learnedly
under the pen-name of H. Lawrenny) being an intimate in the household
at the Priory. Thither, indeed, I was vaguely invited, by word of
mouth, to make my appearance one Sunday, George Eliot having read some
pages of mine with indulgence. But I was shy, and yet should probably
have obeyed the summons but for an event which nobody foresaw. On the
18th of December, 1880, I was present at a concert given, I think, in
the Langham Hall, where I sat just behind Mrs. Cross, as she had then
become. It was chilly in the concert-room, and I watched George Eliot,
in manifest discomfort, drawing up and tightening round her shoulders a
white wool shawl. Four days later she was dead, and I was sorry that I
had never made my bow to her.
Her death caused a great sensation, for she had ruled the wide and
flourishing province of English prose fiction for ten years, since
the death of Dickens. Though she had a vast company of competitors,
she did not suffer through that period from the rivalry of one writer
of her own class. If the Brontës had lived, or Mrs. Gaskell, the case
might have been different, for George Eliot had neither the passion of
_Jane Eyre_ nor the perfection of _Cranford_, but they were gone before
we lost Dickens, and so was Thackeray, who died while _Romola_ was
appearing. Charles Kingsley, whose WESTWARD HO! had just preceded her
first appearance, had unluckily turned into other and less congenial
paths. Charles Reade, whose IT IS NEVER TOO LATE TO MEND (1856) had
been her harbinger, scarcely maintained his position as her rival.
Anthony Trollope, excellent craftsman as he was, remained persistently
and sensibly at a lower intellectual level. Hence the field was free
for George Eliot, who, without haste or hesitation, built up slowly
such a reputation as no one in her own time could approach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account