The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth centuryWroth, Warwick William
History
The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth century
Wroth, Warwick William
London (England) -- History -- 18th century; Parks -- England -- London -- History
But we return to the year 1770, about which time the Dog and Duck took
a new lease of life. A temporary circus established in St. George’s
Fields by Sampson, of The Three Hats, Islington, was the cause of much
additional custom being brought to the tavern, and Mrs. Hedger who
kept the house was obliged to send for her son who was then a youth
in a stable-yard at Epsom. Young Hedger soon saw the possibilities
of the place. He gradually improved the premises and in a few years
was making a large income from the tavern and its tea-garden, which
was much frequented, especially on Sundays.[307] The garden was well
laid out and contained “a pretty piece of water” doubtless one of the
old ducking ponds, and at one time a band played in the garden for
the delectation of the week-day visitors. At night, the long room was
brilliantly lighted for the company who assembled to dance, drink,
and listen to the strains of the organ. Under Hedger, however, the
character of the company went from bad to worse. The “rowdy” delights
of the Dog and Duck are indicated, though probably with an exaggerated
coarseness, in Garrick’s Prologue to “The Maid of the Oaks” acted at
Drury Lane in 1775:--
St. George’s Fields, with taste and fashion struck,
Display Arcadia at the Dog and Duck,
And Drury misses here in tawdry pride,
Are there “Pastoras” by the fountain side;
To frowsy bowers they reel through midnight damps,
With Fauns half drunk, and Dryads breaking lamps.[308]
In about ten years the Dog and Duck had become a place of assignation
and the haunt of “the riff-raff and scum of the town.” One of its
frequenters, Charlotte Shaftoe, is said to have betrayed seven of her
intimates to the gallows. At last, on September 11, 1787, the Surrey
magistrates refused to renew the license. Hedger, like the Music Hall
managers of our own time, was not easily beaten. He appealed to the
City of London, and two City justices claiming to act as justices in
Southwark, renewed the license seven days after its refusal by the
County magistrates. The legality of the civic jurisdiction in Surrey
was tried in 1792 before Lord Kenyon and other judges, who decided
against it. The license of the Dog and Duck was then made conditional
on its being entirely closed on Sundays.[309]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account