The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth centuryWroth, Warwick William
History
The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth century
Wroth, Warwick William
London (England) -- History -- 18th century; Parks -- England -- London -- History
_s._ _d._
Burgundy, a bottle 6 0
Champagne 8 0
Frontiniac 6 0
Claret 5 0
Old hock, with or without sugar 5 0
Two pound of ice 6
Rhenish and sugar 2 6
Mountain 2 6
Red port 2 0
Sherry 2 0
Cyder 1 0
Table beer, a quart mug 4
A chicken 2 6
A dish of ham 1 0
A dish of beef 1 0
Salad 6
A cruet of oil 4
Orange or lemon 3
Sugar for a bottle 6
Ditto for a pint 3
A slice of bread 1
Ditto of butter 2
Ditto of cheese 2
A tart 1 0
A custard 4
A cheese cake 4
A heart cake 2
A Shrewsbury cake 2
A quart of Arrack 8 0
When Tyers leased the gardens in 1728 there was in the dwelling-house a
“Ham Room,” so that this famous Vauxhall viand must have been already
in request. The thinness of the slices was proverbial. A journal of
1762, for instance, complains that you could read the newspaper through
a slice of Tyers’s ham or beef. A certain carver, hardly perhaps
mythical, readily obtained employment from the proprietor when he
promised to cut a ham so thin that the slices would cover the whole
garden like a carpet of red and white.
The chickens were of diminutive size. Mr. Rose, the old citizen in
_The Connoisseur_ (15 May, 1755), found them no bigger than a sparrow
and exclaimed at every mouthful: “There goes twopence--there goes
threepence--there goes a groat ... why it would not have cost me above
fourpence halfpenny to have spent my evening at Sot’s Hole.”
Chicken, ham and beef remained the staple of Vauxhall fare, but from
about 1822 onwards the chicken cost four shillings instead of the
half-crown, at which the old citizen had grumbled. Ham remained steady
at one shilling a plate, and was cut no thicker. Thackeray speaks of
“the twinkling boxes in which the happy feasters made believe to eat
slices of almost invisible ham.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account