Herein, no doubt, is to be found a clue to the whole mystery. If it was
not the honey-bee—the _Apis mellifica_ of modern naturalists—which was
generated from the entombed body of Virgil’s unfortunate bull-calf, what
other insect, closely resembling a bee, could have been produced under
those conditions? The answer has been readily given by several
naturalists of our own time. There is a fly, called the drone-fly, which
exactly meets the difficulty. He is so like the ordinary honey-bee that
on one occasion, and that recently, he was mistaken for the genuine
insect by one calling himself a bee-expert, and holding a diploma
officially entitling him to the use of that name. This drone-fly would
have behaved almost exactly as Virgil’s calf-bred bees are said to have
behaved, and according to the various descriptions of the matter given by
other writers living before and since. He would issue forth in a dense
cloud immediately his natal prison-doors were opened, and he would
comport himself in other ways exactly as enumerated. Finally, he would
beget himself joyously to the open country, as a swarm of bees would do;
and once more the Virgilian theory of bee-production would meet with its
seeming verification.
But having gone thus far with the drone-fly, it is difficult to resist
going a little farther. We cannot leave him in the ignominious company
of slaughtered oxen, but must give him his due of more lordly
associations. “Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong
came forth sweetness.” When Samson went down to Timnath on his fateful
mission of wooing, and saw the carcass by the way beset with a cloud of
insects, we need not cast any doubt on his genuine belief that they were
honey-bees. He propounded his riddle in all good faith, and the form of
it can very well be explained as a not undue stretch of allowable poetic
privilege. But that the creatures he saw hovering about the dead lion
were really bees, and that Samson actually obtained honey from the
carcass, is not to be accepted without the exercise of a faith that is
undistinguishable from credulity. Many attempts have been made to
explain away the difficulties of the problem on natural lines, but they
are all alike unconvincing. There is little doubt at this time that the
part of the story dealing with the honey is nothing but a deft
embroidering on the original legend by some later chronicler; and that
the insects which were seen about the dead lion were really drone-flies
generated in the same fashion as those from Virgil’s ox.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account