With regard to the right of a bee-keeper to follow his swarm into a
neighbour’s land, it is interesting to have the assurance of one of these
ancient writers that “if they will not be stayed, but, hasting on still,
goe beyond your bounds; the ancient Law of Christendome permitteth you to
pursue them whithersoever, for the recovery of your owne.” But, the
writer adds, if your swarm goes so fast and so far that you lose sight
and hearing of them, you also lose all right and property in them. In
this case you have no legal alternative but to leave the bees to
whomsoever may first find them. In view of recent disputes on this
matter, wherein the law laid down appears to have been both vague and
arbitrary, it is useful to be able to point to so ancient an authority in
vindication of the bee-keeper’s rights.
There is hardly any detail in bee-government which had not its curious
observance or superstition in mediæval times. One and all seemed to
believe in the old Virgilian notion that bees carried about little stones
to balance their flight during windy weather, and some even thought that
flowers were carried about in the same way. Red-coloured clothing was
supposed to be particularly offensive to bees, and one is warned not to
venture near the apiary thus attired. In the hives the old bees and the
young were believed to occupy separate quarters. In regard to this, it
is a well-attested fact that, during the height of the honey season, the
bees found in the upper stories of a hive are principally young ones who
have not yet flown.
[Picture: Rev. John Thorley writing his “Melissologia”]
We are told that if any of the bees have not returned to the hive at the
end of the day, the queen goes out to find them and show them the way
back. No one need be in any fear of overlooking the ruler of the hive,
because she can be known by her “lofty pace and countenance expressing
Majesty, and she hath a white spot in her forehead glistering like a
Diadem.”
An old writer advises that all the hives should have holes bored right
through them to prevent spider-webs. He was also of opinion that the
bees swarmed because of the queen’s tyranny, and if she followed them,
they put her to death. He informs us that the drones were honey-bees
which had lost their stings and grown fat. This was a very old idea,
with which the sceptical Butler dealt in the following fashion: “The
general opinion anent the Drone is that he is made of a honey-bee, that
hath lost hir sting; which is even as likelie as that a dwarfe, having
his guts pulled out, should become a gyant.” But the bee-masters of the
Middle Ages were ever intolerant of other people’s mistaken ideas, while
supporting with the gravest argument and show of learning equally
benighted superstitions of their own.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account