International cooperation; Peace; World War, 1914-1918
It was during the last years of the Seven Years’ War that Rousseau
received the papers of the good abbé, with the expectation that he
would prepare them for publication in a more popular form than the
twenty-one volumes in which the author’s thoughts were buried. He
eventually gave up the task, but he produced two short summaries,
one of which was entitled _Extrait du Projet de Paix perpetuelle de
M. L’Abbé de Saint-Pierre_. The “extract” proper was followed by a
“judgment” in which Rousseau voiced his own views. He advocated the
creation of a confederacy mutually dependent, no state to be permitted
to resist all the other states united nor to form an alliance with any
other state in rivalry with the confederacy. The scope of the central
authority was defined, and there was to be a legislature to make laws
in amplification of that authority, such laws to be administered by a
federal court. No state was to withdraw from the union. Thus, Rousseau
made his proposed confederacy rest on force. In his mind it was to be
vitally efficient government, capable of doing all it was created to do.
All the plans I have mentioned contemplated the creation of a central
authority strong enough to make itself obeyed. They implied, therefore,
that each constituent state should relinquish a part of its sovereignty
in order to form the federation. Now this was, as at the present time,
a strong objection to the scheme. No one has met it better than William
Penn, who said:
“I am come now to the last Objection, _That Sovereign Princes
and States will hereby become not Sovereign: a Thing they will
never endure_. But this also, under Correction, is a Mistake, for
they remain as Sovereign at Home as ever they were. Neither their
Power over their People, nor the usual Revenue they pay them,
is diminished: It may be the War Establishment may be reduced,
which will indeed of Course follow, or be better employed to the
Advantage of the Publick. So that the _Soveraignties_ are as they
were, for none of them have now any Soveraignty over one another:
And if this be called a lessening of their Power, it must be only
because the great Fish can no longer eat up the little ones, and
that each Soveraignty is _equally defended_ from Injuries, and
disabled from committing them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account