This seed were to possess the gates of their enemies; of this we are
assured by the oath of God. The word gate here, you will admit, is used
in a generic sense. It means a place of prominence, a position of
strength, a strategetic point, as the entrance into a city. Remembering
that in olden times the cities were walled around, the gate was an
important point of defence; or, as the narrow entrance into a bay, like
the entrance into New York Bay or port, the Narrows we call them. Here
the cities of New York and Brooklyn could best and first be defended.
Again, a gate in the general vernacular means any stronghold: a tower, an
island, a mountain pass. Now, of this seed it is plainly stated that
they shall possess the gates of their enemies.
The text would be very finely illustrated if we supposed that Mexico held
Governor’s Island, in the middle of our bay, and defiantly dictated to us
doctrines of trade, politics, and religion. As arrogant and as impudent
as this would seem, yet such is the case with this seed of Abraham and
other nations. Believing that the Saxon race are the Ten Lost Tribes, it
then follows that the English nation is the chief representative of these
Tribes, and that they should be in possession of the gates of their
enemies. Are they? We answer, yes. And every year confirms and makes
more clear the answer. This you say is a theory. Grant it. You know
that in science a theory is formed and then applied. If you form a
theory about the tides or formation of the planets, or this world, your
theory with others is applied to known facts to see if it will fit them,
to see if it will account for them, and to see if it is in harmony with
the same. Now science accepts that theory which applies best, that which
accounts for facts the most reasonably, and harmonises the most
naturally. Such theory is then the science of the day, and will be so
accepted and so taught until it is supplanted by a better. Try, then,
the theory I have advanced by these rules.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account