The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
A word now as to the outward semblance of these letters. They are fairly
well preserved, the paper being for the most part of a tough though
flimsy nature, which in places shows the handwriting through. The ink is
dim and faded to a dull brown; here and there it is so faint as to be
almost illegible. Königsmarck’s letters differ in size, some being
written on the ordinary notepaper of the day, others on scraps torn
apparently from a pocket-book; some, too, are weather-stained, as though
they had travelled far. Envelopes in all cases are missing; nor were
they generally used in those days. The letter was folded and sealed.
Some of Königsmarck’s letters bear his seal in red or black wax, and a
device—a little heart within a large one—with the motto, _Cosi fosse il
vostro dentro il mio_. One, in addition, has the ends of a green silk
ribbon under the seal, showing how the letter was tied. The seal
represents a flaming heart on an altar, the sun shining down upon it
with the circumscription, _Rien d’impure m’allume_. One, bearing date,
Halle, August 3/13, is addressed to “Madamoiselle la Frole de
Knesbeck, à Zelle”; one is addressed “à la Gouvernante,” one merely
“Pour la Personne Connue,” one “la Frole de Kronbugler”; but there are
none directly addressed to the Princess. All Königsmarck’s letters are
written in the same great sprawling hand.
The letters of the Princess are written on paper of good quality, and
almost without exception of uniform size. Like Königsmarck’s, they bear
evidence of having been folded; but the envelopes are missing, and,
unlike his, none of them bear seal or superscription. They are written
in two distinct handwritings, possibly three, which bears out the theory
that some were written by the Princess in her own hand, some in her
handwriting disguised,[59] and the rest by Knesebeck at the Princess’s
dictation. But, disguised or undisguised, transcribed by Knesebeck or
the Princess, they are easier to read than Königsmarck’s, on account of
their better penmanship, though occasionally they, too, show traces of
haste.
-----
Footnote 59:
Fräulein Knesebeck in the Protocol of her trial expressly states that
the Princess was able to write two different hands.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account