The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
This was the rumour industriously spread abroad; but it was not correct.
Moltke had made no attempt against the life of his sovereign; but he had
undoubtedly plotted against his authority. The old question of the union
of the Dukedoms of Celle and Hanover, and the settling of all territory
on Prince George Louis to the exclusion of his younger brothers, had
cropped up again. This was the Duke of Hanover’s darling scheme, a
necessary step towards the coveted electorate, and he would allow
nothing to come between him and his ambition. The younger princes
stoutly opposed it and rebelled. The Duke of Wolfenbüttel secretly
abetted them, because primogeniture would add largely to the future
aggrandisement of Hanover; and even the Duchess Sophia regarded the plan
with dislike, as it pressed so hardly on her younger sons. Prince
Augustus being dead, it now fell on Prince Max, the third son, to rebel,
and Count Moltke and his brother aided and abetted him. The Wolfenbüttel
secretary was also implicated; the plot was almost ripe, and a rising
was planned, when the conspirators were betrayed by a double traitor,
who had wormed himself into their confidence by pretending to be their
friend. An outbreak of the populace was feared, for the people’s
sympathies were with the young princes in their resistance to this
innovation, and Prince George Louis was unpopular.
The Duke of Hanover’s resentment was very great, especially against his
cousins of Wolfenbüttel, with whom all relations were abruptly broken
off. Prince Max continuing mutinous, and, vowing he would never submit,
was kept a closer prisoner than ever; his guards were doubled and his
mother forbidden to go near him. Indeed, she herself was suspected and
examined before the council. It has been said that the Princess Sophie
Dorothea was implicated too, and Moltke was offered his liberty if he
would confess her share in the business, but he refused and denied. The
suggestion was probably made at the instigation of the Countess Platen,
who would start any lie against the Princess. There is no authority for
the statement; Colt in his long account of the affair does not even
mention the Princess’s name. She was at Celle at the time the plot was
discovered, and both the Duke and Duchess of Celle were in favour of the
ultimate settlement by primogeniture of the dukedoms on Prince George
Louis, seeing that he had wedded their daughter, and the children were
their only descendants.
The Princess and her children came back to Hanover with her parents
early in January for the carnival. “The court of Celle arrived here last
night,” writes Colt, “and were received with extra kindness, much
different to what I have seen since I have been in these parts, and they
seem to bind all their thoughts to secure the union of these two
dukedoms.”[85] And again: “The court of Celle will continue here for
some time, and the Duke and Duchess of Celle shew an extraordinary
fondness for their daughter and grandchildren”.[86]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account