The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
George Louis had now attained his majority. He was not an ideal lover,
by no means a Prince Charming, though so far as looks were concerned he
might have passed muster. He was about the middle height, dark, with
strongly marked features, but he carried himself badly, and was awkward
of figure, still more awkward in manner. He resembled neither of his
parents. Ernest Augustus gilded his faults by a certain generosity and
refinement, which earned for him the title of “the gentleman of
Germany”. George Louis was niggardly, he had no charm of manner, he was
vindictive, sullen, slow of speech, and altogether unprepossessing. His
mother, as we have seen, was a woman of high culture and education and a
ready wit, which caused her to be known as “the merry, _débonnaire_
princess of Germany”. George Louis’s education had been neglected, he
had no love of learning, and an intense dislike of literature, nor had
he any accomplishments save the love of music characteristic of his
race. But, on the other hand, he was a good soldier, a man of the camp
rather than of the court. His tutors threw up their hands in despair
when they endeavoured to teach him anything from books, but he took to
military service as a duck takes to water. He served under his father,
when only fifteen, in the campaign in 1675, and fought bravely at
Consarbrück, at the siege of Treves, and in the campaign on the Rhine;
he was at the sieges of Maestricht and Charleroy, and again at the
battle near St. Denis, and on every occasion he distinguished himself.
He had his own rough code of honour. He never told a lie. He possessed
in a marked degree that courage which even their bitterest detractors
cannot withhold from the princes of the House of Hanover. Yet with all
his military instinct he loved not bloodshed for its own sake; he was a
man of peace. He had humanity for the wounded on the field of battle,
and could respect a fallen foe. His methods were brutal, but
straightforward; he was no intriguer, and, though profligate, he was
honest.
Ernest Augustus was in despair at the rude manners of his boorish son,
and thought that travel would improve him. As he was not over-welcome at
home, he sent him to the court of France, to pick up a little polish for
one thing, and, for another, to try to improve matters between Louis
XIV. and himself. But the young Prince returned much the same. He was
not a diplomatist, and his efforts in that direction were not a success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account