The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
As might be supposed, there was no answer that could be made to this
assertion, and hence the new treaty then drawn up, in which the two
states agreed to renounce respectively whatever pretensions they might
have had to claims one against the other, was ratified by the Senate,
and promulgated by President Jefferson December 21, 1801, thus
relieving France of all responsibility for damages caused by her
cruisers prior to 1800, and throwing the responsibility of liquidating
these demands upon the United States government--a responsibility it
succeeded in avoiding for a hundred years, as it succeeded in avoiding
the demands which the French government could and did make upon it to
defend French West India possessions. These were the "entangling foreign
alliances" referred to by Washington.
Bills granting payment of these claims, which originally amounted to
$12,676,000, passed Congress twice, and were vetoed first by President
Polk and then by President Pierce. If ever there was a just claim
brought before Congress, these French spoliation claims deserve the
title, and it is a historical disgrace to the government of the United
States that the payment of them was delayed for nearly a hundred
years.[74]
[74] During Cleveland's administrations a bill was passed allowing
claimants to present claims for adjudication to the amount of their face
value. If interest was added, they would exceed $100,000,000. The owners
of the 898 vessels destroyed, who were called upon to make this
sacrifice as a means of relieving the government from a great
responsibility, in many cases were reduced to poverty by the duplicity
of the government, and even now with this scant justice, there are many
that find it very difficult to prove their claim, so long a time has
elapsed, and many are dead without legal representation.
CHAPTER VII.
_INDIANS IN THE REVOLUTION._
The writers of American histories severely condemn the British
government for employing Indians in the war of the Revolution as well as
in 1812, and give unstinted praise to the Americans for humanity in
refusing to make use of the warlike but undisciplined and cruel Indian
as an ally in the activities of a military campaign. Either an attempt
is made to suppress the whole truth of this matter, or the writers have
failed in their duty to thoroughly investigate sources of history easily
accessible to the honest historian.
The fact is, that in the incipient stage of the Revolutionary war,
overtures were made by the political disturbers and leading instigators
of trouble to win over to the side of the American party the fiercest,
if not the most numerous Indian nation on the North American continent.
From Concord, on the fourth of April, 1775, the Provincial Congress
thought fit, with cunning prudence, to address the sachem of the
Mohawks, with the rest of the Iroquois tribes, in the following words:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account