The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The members of one wealthy refugee's family were reduced in their
housekeeping to broken chairs and teacups, and to dipping the water out
of an iron skillet into a pot, which they did as cheerfully as if they
were using a silver urn. The furniture had been removed, though the
family picture still hung in the blue room, and the harpsichord stood in
the passage way to be abused by the children who passed through. These
two aristocratic ladies were obliged to use their coach-house as a
dining-room, and the "fowl-house" as their bed chamber. The picture
continues: "In character the old lady looks as majestic even there, and
dresses with as much elegance as if she were in a palace."[86] This
mansion was General Putnam's headquarters at the battle of Bunker Hill,
and was afterward confiscated.
[86] James Murray, Loyalist, p. 245, 253.
When the treaty of peace was signed, the question of amnesty and
compensation for the Loyalists was long and bitterly discussed. Even
the French minister had urged it. John Adams, one of the commission,
favored compensating "the wretches, how little soever they deserved it,
nay, how much soever they deserve the contrary."[87]
[87] John Adams' Works, Vol. IX., p. 516.
The commission hesitated "to saddle" America with the Loyalists because
they feared the opposition at home, especially by the individual states.
The British demand had been finally met with the mere promise that
Congress would recommend to the states a conciliatory policy with
reference to the Loyalists. This solution neither satisfied the
Loyalists nor the more chivalrous Englishmen. They declared that the
provision concerning the Loyalists was "precipitate, impolitic," and
cruelly neglectful of their American friends.[88] But all of this
cavilling was unreasonable and hasty, for England had gotten for the
Loyalists the utmost attainable in the treaty, and later proved
honorable and generous in the highest degree by compensating the
Loyalists out of her own treasury--an act only excelled in the next
century by the purchase and emancipation of all the slaves in the
British Empire, for which the people of Great Britain taxed only
themselves--the most generous act ever performed by any nation in the
history of mankind.
[88] Stevens' "Facsimiles," 1054.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account