The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Today their descendants are organized as the United Empire Loyalists,
and count it an honor that their ancestors suffered persecution and
exile rather than yield the principle and idea of union with Great
Britain.
The cause of the Loyalists failed, but their stand was a natural one and
was just and noble. They were the prosperous and contended men--the men
without a grievance. Conservatism was the only policy that one could
expect of them. Men do not rebel to rid themselves of prosperity.
Prosperous men seek to conceive prosperity. The Loyalist obeyed his
nature, but as events proved, chose the ill-fated cause, and when the
struggle ended, his prosperity had fled, and he was an outcast and an
exile.
If, when George III. and his government recognized the independence of
the thirteen colonies, the Loyalists had been permitted to remain here
and become, if they would, American citizens, the probabilities are
that, long before this time, an expansion would have taken place in the
national domain which would have brought under its control the entire
American continent north of the United States, an extension brought
about in an entirely peaceful and satisfactory manner. The method of
exclusion adopted peopled Canada, so far as its English-speaking
inhabitants were concerned, with those who went from the United States
as political exiles, and who carried with them to their new homes an
ever-burning sense of personal wrong and a bitter hatred of those who
had abused them.
The indifference shown to treaty obligations by Congress and the states,
and the secret determination to eradicate everything British from the
country, is now known to have been the deliberate, well-considered
policy of the founders of the Republic.
This old legacy of wrongdoing has been a barrier in the way of a
healthful northern development of the United States. The contentions
which gave rise to these hostile feelings have been forgotten, but the
feelings themselves have long outlived the causes which gave rise to
them.
CHAPTER IX.
_THE WAR OF 1812 AND THE ATTEMPTED CONQUEST OF CANADA._
When the Revolutionary War had ended came the long twenty-three years'
war in which Great Britain, for the most part, single-handed, fought for
the freedom of Europe against the most colossal tyranny ever devised by
a victorious general. No nation in the history of the world carried on a
war so stubborn, so desperate, so costly, so vital. Had Great Britain
failed, what would now be the position of the world? At the very time
when Britain's need was the sorest, when every ship, every soldier and
sailor that she could find was needed to break down the power of the man
who had subjugated all Europe except Russia and Great Britain, the
United States, the land of boasted liberty, did her best to cripple the
liberating armies by proclaiming war against Britain in the hour of her
sorest need.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account