The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Napoleon was at the height of his power, with an army collected at
Boulogne for the invasion of England. England was growing exhausted by
the contest. Her great Prime Minister, Pitt, had died broken hearted.
Every indication was favorable to the conquest of Canada by the United
States and therewith the extinction of all British interests on the
western continent.
In the motherland it seemed, to the popular imagination, that on the
other side of the Atlantic lived an implacable enemy, whose rancor was
greater than their boasted love of liberty. Fisher Ames, who was
regarded by his party as its wisest counsellor and chief ornament,
expresses this general feeling on their part in a letter to Mr. Quincy,
dated Dedham, Dec. 6, 1807, in which he says: "Our cabinet takes council
of the mob, and it is now a question whether hatred of Great Britain and
the reproach fixed even upon violent men, if they will not proceed in
their violence, will not overcome the fears of the maritime states, and
of the planters in Congress. The usual levity of a democracy has not
appeared in regard to Great Britain. We have been steady in our hatred
of her, and when popular passions are not worn out by time, but
argument, they must, I should think, explode in war."[89]
[89] Life of Josiah Quincy, p. 119.
The action of the United States in declaring war against Great Britain
when she was most sorely pressed in righting for the liberty of mankind
is best set forth in the famous speech of Josiah Quincy, delivered
before Congress on the 5th of January, 1813. It was, as he himself says
of it, "most direct, pointed and searching as to the motive and conduct
of our rulers. It exposed openly and without reserve or fear the
iniquity of the proposed invasion of Canada. I was sparing of neither
language nor illustration." Its author, on reading it over in his old
age, might well say that "he shrunk not from the judgment of after
times." Its invective is keen, its sarcasm bitter, its denunciations
heavy and severe, but the facts from which they derive their sting or
their weight are clearly stated and sustained.
As a means of carrying on the war, he denounces the invasion of Canada
as "cruel, wanton, senseless, and wicked--an attempt to compel the
mother country to our terms by laying waste an innocent province which
had never injured us, but had long been connected with us by habits of
good neighborhood and mutual good offices." He said "that the
embarrassment of our relations with Great Britain and the keeping alive
between this country and that of a root of bitterness has been, is, and
will continue to be, a main principle of the policy of this American
Cabinet."
The Democratic Party having attained power by fostering the old grudge
against England, and having maintained itself in power by force of that
antipathy, a consent to the declaration of war had been extorted from
the reluctant Madison as the condition precedent of his nomination for a
second term of office.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account