The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
When war against Great Britain was proposed at the last session, there
were thousands in these United States, and I confess to you I was myself
among the number, who believed not one word of the matter, I put my
trust in the old-fashioned notions of common sense and common prudence.
That a people which had been more than twenty years at peace should
enter upon hostilities against a people which had been twenty years at
war, the idea seemed so absurd that I never once entertained it as
possible. It is easy enough to make an excuse for any purpose. When a
victim is destined to be immolated, every hedge presents sticks for the
sacrifice. The lamb that stands at the mouth of the stream will always
trouble the water if you take the account of the wolf who stands at the
source of it. We have heard great lamentation about the disgrace of our
arms on the frontier. Why, sir, the disgrace of our arms on the frontier
is terrestrial glory in comparison with the disgrace of the attempt. Mr.
Speaker, when I contemplate the character and consequences of this
invasion of Canada, when I reflect on its criminality and its danger to
the peace and liberty of this once happy country, I thank the great
Author and Source of all virtue that, through His grace, that section of
country in which I have the happiness to reside, is in so great a degree
free from the iniquity of this transgression. I speak it with pride. The
people of that section have done what they could to vindicate themselves
and their children from the burden of their sin.
Surely if any nation had a claim for liberal treatment from another, it
was the British nation from the American. After the discovery of the
error of the American government in relation to the repeal of the Berlin
and Milan Decrees in November, 1810, they had declared war against her
on the supposition that she had refused to repeal her orders in council
after the French Decrees were in fact revoked, whereas it now appears
that they were in fact not revoked. Surely the knowledge of this error
was followed by an instant and anxious desire to redress the resulting
injury. No, sir, nothing occurred. On the contrary the question of
impressment is made the basis of continuing the war. They renewed
hostilities. They rushed upon Canada. Nothing would satisfy them but
blood.
I know, Mr. Speaker, that while I utter these things, a thousand tongues
and a thousand pens are preparing without doors to overwhelm me, if
possible, by their pestiferous gall. Already I hear in the air the sound
of "Traitor," "British Agent," "British Gold!" and all those changes of
calumny by which the imagination of the mass of men are affected and by
which they are prevented from listening to what is true and receiving
what is reasonable.[90]
[90] Life of Josiah Quincy, pp. 256, 280, 281, 282, 283, 286, 287, 288,
289, 291.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account