The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Three months after making this prediction, the surrender of the United
States invading force to the British General Brock, or as Jefferson
preferred to style it, "the detestable treason of Hull," "excited," he
writes, "a deep anxiety in all breasts." A few months later we find him
lamenting that "our war on the land was commenced most inauspiciously."
This has resulted, he thinks, from the employment of generals before it
is known whether they will "stand fire" and has cost us thousands of
good men and deplorable degradation of reputation.(*) "The treachery,
cowardice, and imbecility of the men in command has sunk our spirits at
home and our character abroad."[93]
[93] Jefferson's Works, Vol. VI., pp. 99, 193, 104.
At the commencement of the war of 1812, the whole number of British
troops in Canada was 4450, supplemented by about four thousand Canadian
militia. With this corporal guard it was necessary to protect a frontier
of over 1600 miles in length. Any part of this line was liable to an
invasion of United States troops whose lines of communication were far
superior. Moreover Great Britain was unable to send reinforcements until
after the fall of Napoleon in June, 1814, when the war was nearly fought
out.
American writers have always severely criticised the British for burning
the public buildings when they captured Washington. Ex-President
Jefferson, who proposed that the criminal classes of London should be
hired to burn that city, stigmatized the burning of Washington as
"vandalism," and declared it would "immortalize the infamy" of Great
Britain. He who could contemplate with equanimity the fearful horrors
that must have resulted from the putting in practice of his monstrous
proposition to burn a city crowded with peaceful citizens, professed to
be horrified at the destruction of a few public buildings by which no
man, woman or child, was injured in person or property. With equal
hypocrisy he professed to believe that no provocation for the act was
given by the United States commanders. Upon this point he was taken to
an account by an open letter from Dr. John Strachan, afterwards Bishop
of Toronto. This letter should be preserved as long as there lives a
British apologist for the acts of the United States in the War of 1812.
In part it was as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account