The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution — John Shaqi
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
After the death of Oliver Cromwell, Charles II. was proclaimed in London
the lawful King of England, and the news of it in due time reached
Boston. It was a sad day to many, and they received the intelligence
with sorrow and concern, for they saw that a day of retribution would
come. But there was no alternative, and the people of Boston made up
their minds to submit to a power they could not control. They, however,
kept a sort of sullen silence for a time, but fearing this might be
construed into contempt, or of opposition to the King, they formally
proclaimed him, in August, 1661, more than a year after news of the
Restoration had come. Meanwhile the Quakers in England had obtained the
King's ear, and their representations against the government at Boston
caused the King to issue a letter to the governor, requiring him to
desist from any further proceedings against them, and calling upon the
government here to answer the complaints made by the Quakers. A ship was
chartered, and Samuel Shattock, who had been banished, was appointed to
carry the letter, and had the satisfaction of delivering it to the
governor with his own hand. After perusing it, Mr. Endicott replied, "We
shall obey his Majesty's command," and then issued orders for the
discharge of all Quakers then in prison. The requisition of the king for
some one to appear to answer the complaints against the government of
Boston, caused much agitation in the General Court; and when it was
decided to send over agents, it was not an easy matter to procure
suitable persons, so sensible was everybody that the complaints to be
answered had too much foundation to be easily excused, or by any
subterfuge explained away. It is worthy of note that the two persons
finally decided upon (Mr. Bradstreet and Mr. Norton) were men who had
been the most forward in the persecutions of the Quakers. And had it not
been for the influence which Lord Saye and Seale of the king's Council,
and Col. Wm. Crowne, had with Charles II., the colony would have felt
his early and heavy displeasure. Col. Crowne was in Boston when Whalley
and Goffe, the regicides, arrived here, and he could have made
statements regarding their reception, and the persecution of the
Quakers, which might have caused the king to take an entirely different
course from the mild and conciliatory one which, fortunately for Boston,
was taken. Having "graciously" received the letter from the hands of the
agents, and, although he confirmed the Patent and Charter, objects of
great and earnest solicitude in their letter to him, yet "he required
that all their laws should be reviewed, and that such as were contrary
or derogatory to the king's authority should be annulled; that the oath
of allegiance should be administered; that administration of justice
should be in the king's name; that liberty should be given to all who
desired it, to use the Book of Common Prayer; in short, establishing
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account