The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The correctness of the position of Hutchinson in the case of the Writs
of Assistance have been maintained and exhibited in detail by so high an
authority as the late Horace Gray, Esq., for many years Chief Justice of
the Supreme Court of Massachusetts and at the time of his decease
justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.[110] A currency
dispute took place in 1762 as regards the parity between gold and
silver. Hutchinson represented the Council and Otis the House, the
former, true to the policy which had already been of such advantage, set
himself once more against a course certain to lead to a disastrous
depreciation. This financial controversy led to further unpopularity,
and lost him not only a great number of friends, but the House while
reducing the allowance to the Superior Court in general, refused to make
any allowance to him whatever as Chief Justice. After the great war with
France, which was waged mainly for the benefit of the Colonies, it was
found that England had a debt of £140,000,000 instead of £70,000,000
which it had before the war. England also had paid the Colonies vast
sums of money as previously stated, expenses incurred in protecting
themselves from the French. The American civil and military
establishments before the war was £70,000 per annum, it was now
£350,000. George Grenville, Chancellor of the Exchequer thought that the
Colonies ought to contribute towards it; he did not expect them to raise
the whole, but a portion of it, and did not intend to charge them with
any interest on the national debt, although it was largely incurred on
their behalf.
[110] See Quincy, Massachusetts Reports 1761-1772. Appendix 1.
In February, 1765, he laid a bill before Parliament for further
defraying the expenses of protecting the colonies and he proposed to
charge certain stamp duties in said colonies. The agents of the several
colonies had an interview with him and tried to dissuade him from it. He
replied that he had considered the whole case and believed the colonies
should contribute something to the mother country to pay for their
protection, every penny of which would be spent in the colonies, and
that he knew of no better way than a stamp tax. "If," he said, "you can
tell of a better, I will adopt it." Benjamin Franklin, proposed that the
demand for money should be made in the old constitutional way in the
form of a requisition to the Assembly of each province. Can you agree,
rejoined Grenville, on the proportion that each colony should raise. The
question touched the heart of the difficulty, the agents were obliged to
answer in the negative, and the interview speedily closed, a few days
later the fatal Bill passed,--one of the most momentous legislative Acts
in the history of mankind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account