The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
As the autumn deepened Hutchinson interpreted as favorable to himself
the symptoms he perceived of the mood of the people. Oct. 16, 1773, he
writes, "I now see so great a change in the people wherever I travel
about the country, that I have reason to think I shall rather gain than
lose by the late detestable proceedings, and my friends express stronger
attachments to me than ever." This was only a brief Indian summer of
favor before the outbreak, not now distant, of a storm more cold and
pitiless than ever, for a crisis was now at hand more threatening than
any that had preceded it. As shown in a previous chapter,[133] after the
repeal of the Stamp Act in order to pacify the colonists, a duty was
placed on tea, and other imports, which the colonists had always
admitted to be a valid Act of the Parliament. No revenue probably had
ever been expected from it. It was felt that the principle that
Parliament might tax must be maintained; the cost of collection was
greater than the proceeds. Instead of paying 12d per pound export duty
from England, only 3d per pound was to be charged, when imported by the
East India Company to the Colonies, thereby making a saving to the
colonists of 9d per pound which would make tea cheaper than that
smuggled in from the Dutch colonies.[134]
[133] Lecky's Am. Rev. pp. 150, 151, 152.
[134] See p. 47, for further information concerning the Stamp Act and
the Tea Tax.
The project of sending the tea, was decided on in May, 1773, and
Massachusetts was the Colony where the crisis was to come. The
consignees were important persons. Two of them were Thomas and Elisha
Hutchinson, sons of the Governor, a third was the Governor's nephew
Richard Clarke, father-in-law of Copley, the painter, a fourth was
Benjamin Faneuil, a nephew of Peter Faneuil, deceased, a fifth Joshua
Winslow, also of a memorable family. These held bravely to the task that
had been set for them, putting their property and lives in jeopardy
until finally they were driven to seek refuge in the Castle. Of those
opposed to them Samuel Adams was the chief, followed by Hancock,
Bowdoin, Dr. Thomas Young, Dr. Joseph Warren, Dr. Benjamin Church,
Josiah Quincy, John Scollay, and others who lent their hands to action
and their heads to counsel. Historic truth also compels the statement
that the man put forward to do the disreputable work for them was
"Captain Mackintosh" leader of the South End toughs in street fights
with the North Enders, leader of the rioters in the destruction of the
Governor's home in August, 1765. For his part in that affair he had
never been punished, and now seems to have been rather a popular pet. He
was styled the "First Captain-General of Liberty-Tree," and managed the
illumination, hanging of effigies, etc. Long afterwards, in speaking of
the Tea Party he said, "It was my chickens that did the job."[135]
[135] Francis Drake. "Tea Leaves." Introd. p. CXXVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account