The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The time for temporising, it was said, was over. It was necessary to
show that England possessed some real power of executing her laws and
the ministers were probably supported by a large majority of the English
people, when they resolved to throw away the scabbard, and to exert all
the power of Parliament to reduce Massachusetts to obedience.[140] The
measures that were taken were very stringent. By one Act, the harbor of
Boston was legally closed. "The Custom House officers were removed to
Salem. All landing, lading, and shipping of merchandise in Boston harbor
was forbidden, and English men-of-war were appointed to maintain the
blockade. The town which owed its whole prosperity to its commercial
activity was debarred from all commerce by sea and was to continue under
this ban, till it had made compensation to the East India Company for
the tea which had been destroyed, and had satisfied the crown that trade
would for the future be safely carried on in Boston, property protected,
laws obeyed, and duties regularly paid."[141] By another Act, Parliament
was to remodel the charter of Massachusetts, the Council or Upper
Chamber was now to be appointed as in most of the other colonies of
America by the crown. The judges and magistrates of all kinds, including
the sheriffs, were to be appointed by the royal governor. Jurymen were
to be summoned by the Sheriffs. That these Acts of the British
Parliament at this time was necessary is beyond question, for there was
a mob in revolutionary Boston at this time, scarcely less foul-mouthed,
pitiless, unscrupulous, than that which roared for the blood of the
Bourbons in revolutionary Paris, or that of the Commons of later times.
Mackintosh and his crew were unmistakably in evidence, certainly not
restrained, but connived at by the better men, so that those just as
conscientious and patriotic, who tried by lawful ways to oppose, found
destruction for their property imminent, and could feel that their lives
were secure only when they had fled down the harbor to the Castle.
[140] Lecky's Am. Rev., pp. 154, 164, 165, 166.
[141] 14 George III., c. 19, 45.
John Adams was one of the very few "patriots" who really disowned and
opposed mob violence; not only did he defend the soldiers for killing
some of the mob, but in a letter to his wife, he said: "mobs I do and
will detest."[142]
[142] Letters of John Adams, Vol. 1., p. 13.
[Illustration: (View from Governor Hutchinson's Field.)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account