The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
On the day following the riot, Mr. Oliver resigned
his office. In writing to a friend he says, "I was persuaded to yield in
order to prevent what was coming on the second night." This action of
the mob caused intense suffering both to himself and family.[151]
[150] John Adams' Diary, Aug. 15, 1765.
[151] See page 40 for account of the riot.
In 1770, Mr. Oliver was appointed Lieutenant Governor. In 1773, several
letters which he had written to persons in England, and which were
obtained surreptitiously by Franklin and sent to Boston, created much
excitement and abuse of the writers.[152] In addition to the assaults
at home, he was accused in England by Arthur Lee who signed himself
Junius Americanus with the grave crime of perjury. "Scarce any man ever
had a more scrupulous and sacred regard for truth, and yet, to such a
degree did the malignant spirit of party prevail as to cause this man in
the public papers in England, to bring against him a charge of perjury.
The Council of Massachusetts Bay, from whose votes and resolves this
writer attempted to support the charge, by vote which they caused to be
printed, repaired the injury as well as they could, but a consciousness
of his innocence and integrity, however, together with the reproaches
most injuriously cast upon him by the resolves of the council and house,
in which he was treated as the determined enemy of the liberties of his
country, the interest whereof according to the best of his judgment
(which was much superior to that of his most virulent persecutors) he
always had at heart, affected his spirits and evidently accelerated his
death."[153] Mr. Oliver was now advanced in life, and unable to endure
the disquiet and misery caused by his position in affairs at so troubled
a period, soon sunk under the burden. After a short illness he died at
Boston in March 1774, aged 67. By the testimony of foes as well as
friends, he was a most useful and estimable man, modest, indefatigable,
well-cultured, soundly sensible. He had been the most beloved member of
a family greatly beloved, and no charge could be brought against him
except that in his political principles he sided with the Government. He
was a liberal benefactor to his ALMA MATER in books, ancient
manuscripts, and anatomical preparations. At his funeral the mob was
again in evidence. The House of Representatives withdrew from the
procession because a certain punctilio was neglected. The mob of Boston
ran after the funeral train hooting and in an unseemly way hilarious,
gave three cheers when the mourners came out of the graveyard, his
brother the Chief Justice, intrepid as he was, did not dare to be
present, because his life was threatened. Had he died before this
violent spirit was raised, he would have been revered by all orders and
degrees of men in the Province.
[152] See page 162, 163 concerning Hutchinson and other letters
abstracted by Franklin.
[153] Curwin's Journal, pp. 462, 463.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account