The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Washington in 1774 fully sustains their declarations, and in the
"Fairfax County Resolves" it was complained that "malevolent falsehoods"
were propagated by the ministry to prejudice the mind of the king,
particularly that there is an intention in the American colonies to set
up for independent state.
Mr. Madison says: "It has always been my impression that a
re-establishment of the colonial relations to the mother country, as
they were previous to the controversy, was the real object of every
class of the people till they despaired of obtaining redress for their
grievances."
This feeling among the revolutionists is corroborated by DuPortail, a
secret agent of the French government. In a letter dated 1778 he says:
"There is a hundred times more enthusiasm for the revolution in a
coffee-house at Paris than in all the colonies united. This people,
though at war with the English, hate the French more than they hate
them; we prove this every day, and notwithstanding everything that
France has done or can do for them, they will prefer a reconciliation
with their ancient brethren. If they must needs be dependent, they had
rather be so on England."
Again, as late as March, 1775, only a month before the outbreak of
hostilities at Lexington, John Adams wrote: "That there are any that
hunt after independence is the greatest slander on the Province."
This feeling must have arisen from gratitude for the protection afforded
by the mother country, or at least satisfaction with the relations then
existing. It is true, as has been shown in a previous chapter, that for
some years before the English Revolution, and for some years after the
accession of William and Mary, the relations of the colonies to England
had been extremely tense, but in the long period of unbroken Whig rule
which followed, most of the elements of discontent had subsided. The
wise neglect of Walpole and Newcastle was eminently conducive to
colonial interests. The substitution in several colonies of royal for
proprietary government was very popular. There were slight differences
in the colonial forms of government, but everywhere the colonists paid
their governor and their other officials. In nearly every respect they
governed themselves, under the shadow of British dominion, with a
liberty not equalled in any other portion of the civilized globe; real
constitutional liberty was flourishing in the English colonies when all
European countries and their colonies were despotically governed. The
circumstances and traditions of the colonists had made them extremely
impatient of every kind of authority, but there is no reason for
doubting that they were animated by a real attachment to England. Their
commercial intercourse, under the restructions of the navigation laws,
was mainly with her. Their institutions, their culture, their religion,
their ideas were derived from English sources. They had a direct
interest in the English war against France and Spain. They were proud of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account