The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
to secure such reform, and not for a rejection of the authority of the
general government, nullification, and disruption of the empire.
Accordingly, when certain English commoners in America at last rose up
and put forward the claim that merely because they had no votes for
members of the house of commons, therefore that house did not represent
them, and therefore they could not lawfully be taxed by parliament, this
definition of the word "representation" up to that time had never been
given to it in England or enjoyed by commoners in England. Nine-tenths
of the people of England did not vote. Had not those British subjects in
England as good a right as these British subjects in America to deny
they were represented in parliament, and that they could not be lawfully
taxed by parliament? It was the right and duty of the imperial
legislature to determine in what proportion the different parts of the
empire should contribute to the defence of the whole, and to see that no
one part evaded its obligation and unjustly transferred its part to
others. The right of taxation was established by a long series of legal
authorities, and there was no real distinction between internal and
external taxation. It now suited colonists to describe themselves as
apostles of liberty and to denounce England as an oppressor. It was a
simple truth that England governed her colonies more liberally than any
other country in the world. They were the only existing colonies which
enjoyed real political liberty. Their commercial system was more liberal
than that of any other colony. They had attained under British rule to a
degree of prosperity which was surpassed in no quarter of the globe.
England had loaded herself with debt in order to remove one great danger
to their future; she cheerfully bore the whole burden of their
protection by sea. At the Peace of Paris she had made their interests
the very first object of her policy, and she only asked them in return
to bear a portion of the cost of their own defence. Less than eight
millions of Englishmen were burdened with a national debt of 140,000,000
pounds. The united debt of about three millions of Americans was now
less than 800,000 pounds. The annual sum the colonists were asked to
contribute was less than 100,000, with an express condition that no part
of that sum should be devoted to any other purpose than the defence and
protection of the colonies, and the country which refused to bear this
small tax was so rich that in the space of three years it had paid off
1,755,000 pounds of its debt. No demand could be more moderate and
equitable than that of England. The true motive of the resistance was a
desire to pay as little as possible and to throw as much as possible
upon the mother country. Nor was the mode of resistance more
honorable--the plunder of private houses, and custom-houses, and mob
violence, connived at and unpunished. This was the attitude of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account