The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The address from the Continental Congress was translated into French and
was very favorably received. They then begged the translator, as he had
succeeded so well, to try his hand on that addressed to Great Britain.
He had equal success in this, and read his performance to a numerous
audience. But when he came to that part which treats of the new
modelling of the province, draws a picture of the Catholic religion and
Canadian manners, they could not restrain their resentment nor express
it except in broken curses. "O the perfidious, double-faced Congress!
Let us bless and obey our benevolent prince, whose humanity is
consistent and extends to all religions. Let us abhor all who would
seduce us from our loyalty by acts that would dishonor a Jesuit, and
whose address, like their resolves, is destructive of their own
objects."
While the commissioners were applying themselves with the civil
authorities, Rev. Mr. Carroll was diligently employed with the clergy,
explaining to them that the resistance of the united colonies was caused
by the invasion of their charter by England. To this the clergy replied
that since the acquisition of Canada by the British government its
inhabitants had no aggression to complain of, that on the contrary the
government had faithfully complied with all the stipulations of the
treaty, and had in fact sanctioned and protected the laws and customs of
Canada with a delicacy that demanded their respect and gratitude, and
that on the score of religious liberty the British government had left
them nothing to complain of.
And therefore that when the well-established principle that allegiance
is due to protection, the clergy could not teach that even neutrality
was consistent with the allegiance due to such ample protection as
Great Britain had shown the Catholics of Canada. The judicious and
liberal policy of the British government to the Catholics had succeeded
in inspiring them with sentiments of loyalty which the conduct of the
people and the public bodies of some of the united colonies had served
to strengthen and confirm. Mr. Carroll was also informed that in the
colonies whose liberality he was now avouching, the Catholic religion
had not been tolerated hitherto. Priests were excluded under severe
penalties and Catholic missionaries among the Indians rudely and cruelly
treated.
John Adams, who was a member of the congress that sent the commissioners
to Canada, in a letter to his wife, did not state the true reason for
sending a Jesuit priest there, and also warned her against divulging the
fact that a priest had been sent, for fear of offending his
constituents[16]
He wrote as follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account