The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The claim has been set up by American historians, and accepted as true
by those of Great Britain, that hostilities were commenced at Lexington
and by the British commander. This is not so. The first act of
hostilities was the attack upon the government post of Fort William and
Mary at Newcastle, in Portsmouth harbor, New Hampshire. The attack was
deliberately planned by the disunion leaders, and executed by armed and
disciplined forces mustered by them for that purpose.[38] The fort
contained large quantities of government arms and ammunition, and being
garrisoned by but a corporal's guard, it was too tempting a prize to be
overlooked by Samuel Adams and his colleagues.
Sir John Wentworth, governor of New Hampshire, tells us that the raiding
party was openly collected by beat of drum in the streets of Portsmouth,
and that, being apprised of their intent to attack a government fort, he
sent the chief justice to warn them that such an act "was short of
rebellion," and entreated them not to undertake it, "but all to no
purpose." They embarked in three boats, sailed to the fortress and
"forced an entrance in spite of Captain Cochrane, the commander, who
defended it as long as he could. They then secured the captain
triumphantly, gave three cheers, and hauled down the king's colors."[38]
[38] Letter of Governor Wentworth, New Eng. His. Gen. Reg., 1869, page
274.
Thomas Coffin Amory, in his "Military Service of General Sullivan," says
(p. 295) that "the raiding force consisted of men whom Sullivan had been
drilling for several months; that they captured 97 kegs of powder and a
quantity of small ammunition which were used against the British at
Bunker Hill."
The attack on this fort is worthy of far more consideration than has
been given to it, for not only did it occur prior to the conflict at
Concord, but was the direct cause of that conflict. It was as much the
commencement of the Revolutionary war as was the attack on Fort Sumpter
by the disunionists, in 1861, the commencement of the Civil War, and had
precisely the same effect in each case. When the news reached London
that a government fort had been stormed by an organized force, its
garrison made prisoners and the flag of the empire torn down, the
ministers seem to have become convinced that it was the determination of
the colonists to make war upon the government. To tolerate such a
proceeding would be a confession that all law and authority was at an
end. Some vindication of that authority must be attempted. An order was
dispatched to General Gage to retake the munitions that had been seized
by the disunion forces, and any other found stored that might be used
for attacking the government troops; surely a very mild measure of
reprisal. It was in obedience to this order that the expedition was
dispatched to Concord, that brought about the collision between the
British and colonial troops and the so-called "Battle of Lexingon."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account