The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
At the outbreak of the American rebellion the great majority of men in
the colonies could be regarded as indifferent, ready to stampede and
rush along with the successful party. Loyalty was their normal
condition; the state _had_ existed and _did_ exist, and it was the
disunionists who must do the converting, the changing of men's opinion
to suit a new order of things which the disunionists believed necessary
for their welfare. Opposed to the revolutionists were the crown
officials, dignified and worthy gentlemen, who held office by virtue of
a wise selection. Hardly to be distinguished from the official class
were the clergy of the Established Church, who were partially dependent
for their livings upon the British government. The officers and clergy
received the support of the landowners and the substantial business men,
the men who were satisfied with the existing order of things. The
aristocracy of culture, of dignified professions and callings, of
official rank and hereditary wealth, was, in a large measure, found in
the Loyalist party. Such worthy and talented men of high social
positions were the leaders of the opposition to the rebellion.
Supporting them was the natural conservatism of all prosperous men. The
men who had abilities which could not be recognized under the existing
regime, and those that form the lower strata of every society and are
every ready to overthrow the existing order of things, these were the
ones who were striving to bring about a change--a revolution.
The persecution of the Loyalists by the Sons of Despotism, or the "Sons
of Liberty," as they called themselves, was mercilessly carried out;
every outrage conceivable was practiced upon them. Freedom of speech was
suppressed; the liberty of the press destroyed; the voice of truth
silenced, and throughout the colonies was established a lawless power.
As early as 1772 "committees of correspondence" had been organized
throughout Massachusetts. Adams exclaimed in admiration: "What an
engine! France imitated it and produced a revolution."[40] Leonard, the
Loyalist, with "abhorrence pronounced it the foulest, subtlest and most
venomous serpent ever issued from the egg of sedition."[41] Insult and
threat met the Loyalist at every turn. One day he was, perhaps, set upon
a cake of ice to cool his loyalty,[42] and was then informed that a
certain famous liberty man had sworn to be his butcher. Next he was told
that he might expect a "sans benito" of tar and feathers, and even an
"auto da fe." The committee sent "Patriot" newspapers and other
propaganda to the wavering or obstinate, but seldom failed to follow
this system of conversion with a personal interview if the literature
failed. Such were the means that were used by the "Sons of Despotism" to
bring over the mass of the people to the disunion cause.
[40] John Adams' Letters. Vol. X, page 197.
[41] "Massachusettsensis."
[42] "Moor's Diary." Vol. I., page 359.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account