The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
In the courts of law, not even the rights of a foreigner were left to
the Loyalist. If his neighbors owed him money he had no legal redress
until he took an oath that he favored American independence. All legal
action was denied him. He might be assaulted, insulted, blackmailed or
slandered, though the law did not state it so boldly, yet he had no
recourse in law. No relative or friend could leave an orphan child, to
his guardianship. He could be the executor or administrator of no man's
estate. He could neither buy land nor transfer it to another; he was
denied his vocation and his liberty to speak or write his opinions. All
these restrictions were not found in any one place, nor at any one time,
nor were they always rigorously enforced. Viewed from the distance of
one hundred years, the necessity of such barbarous severity is not now
apparent.
When this ostracism was approved by a large majority of the inhabitants
of a town the victim was practically expelled from the community. None
dared to give him food or comfort. He was a pariah, and to countenance
him was to incur public wrath.
On January 17, 1777, Massachusetts passed an Act punishing with death
the "Crime of adhering to Great Britain." The full extent of this law
was not carried into effect in Massachusetts, but it was in other
colonies. The "Black List" of Pennsylvania contained the names of 490
persons attainted of high treason. Only a few actually suffered the
extreme penalty. Among these were two citizens of Philadelphia--Mr.
Roberts and Mr. Carlisle. When the British army evacuated Philadelphia,
they remained, although warned of their danger. They were at once seized
by the returning disunionists and condemned to be hanged. Mr. Roberts's
wife and children went before congress and on their knees supplicated
for mercy, but in vain. In carrying out the sentence the two men, with
halters around their necks, were walked to the gallows behind a cart,
"attended with all the apparatus which makes such scenes truly
horrible." A guard of militia accompanied them; but few spectators.[43]
[43] "Penn Packet," Nov. 17, 1778. "Penn Archives," Vol. VIII, page 22.
"Dallis," Vol. I., pp 39, 42; "Galloway's Examinations," page 77.
At the gallows Mr. Roberts' behavior, wrote a loyal friend, "did honor
to human nature," and both showed fortitude and composure.
Roberts told his audience that his conscience acquitted him of guilt:
that he suffered for doing his duty to his sovereign; that his blood
would one day be required at their hands. Turning to his children he
charged and exhorted them to remember his principles for which he died,
and to adhere to them while they had breath. "He suffered with the
resolution of a Roman," wrote a witness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account