The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Familiar New England names meet one at every turn in the maritime
provinces, especially Nova Scotia. Dr. Inglis, from Trinity church, New
York, was the first bishop, and Judge Sewell, of Massachusetts, the
first chief justice there. The harshness of the laws and the greed of
the new commonwealth had driven into exile men who could be ill spared,
and whose absence showed itself in the lack of balance and of political
steadiness which characterized the early history of the republic, while
the newly-founded colonies, composed almost exclusively of
conservatives, were naturally slow, but sure, in their development. The
men who were willing to give up home, friends and property, for an idea,
are not men to be despised; they are, rather, men for us to claim with
pride and honor as American--men of the same blood, and the same speech
as ourselves; Americans who were true to their convictions and who
suffered everything except the loss of liberty, for their political
faith. We look in vain among the lists of voluntary and banished
refugees from Massachusetts for a name on which rests any tradition of
disgrace or infamy, to which the finger of scorn can be pointed. Can
this be said of the Revolutionary leaders of Massachusetts, the
so-called patriots, to whom the Revolution owes its inception? If the
reader has any doubts on this subject, then let him compare the lives of
the Loyalists, as given in this work, with those of Samuel Adams, John
Hancock, and other Revolutionary leaders. The Loyalists were generally
people of substance; their stake in the country was greater, even, than
that of their opponents; their patriotism, no doubt, fully as fervent.
"There is much that is melancholy, of which the world knows but little,
connected with this expulsion from the land they sincerely loved. The
estates of the Loyalists were among the fairest, their stately mansions
stood on the sightliest hill-brows, the richest and best-tilled meadows
were their farms; the long avenue, the broad lawn, the trim hedge about
the garden, servants, plate, pictures, for the most part these things
were at the homes of the Loyalists. They loved beauty, dignity and
refinement." The rude contact of town meetings was offensive to their
tastes. The crown officials were courteous, well-born and congenial
gentlemen.
"The graceful, the chivalrous, the poetic, the spirits over whom these
feelings had power, were sure to be Loyalists. Democracy was something
rude and coarse, and independence to them meant a severance of those
connections of which a colonist ought to be proudest."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account