The Lusitania's Last Voyage: Being a narrative of the torpedoing and sinking of the R. M. S. Lusitania by a German submarine off the Irish coast, May 7, 1915 — John Shaqi
The Lusitania's Last Voyage: Being a narrative of the torpedoing and sinking of the R. M. S. Lusitania by a German submarine off the Irish coast, May 7, 1915Lauriat, Charles Emelius, Jr.
History
The Lusitania's Last Voyage: Being a narrative of the torpedoing and sinking of the R. M. S. Lusitania by a German submarine off the Irish coast, May 7, 1915
Lauriat, Charles Emelius, Jr.
Lusitania (Steamship)
shopkeeper-spirit about it! The feeling is genuine. Impotent rage! And
that was the very thing which caused our danger, and, in the last
analysis, that also was the reason why war was brought upon us.
_England_,[2] the nation of sailors, the world power, _is overtaken_ by
us juniors, and things exist which enable us to outstrip her. And
because this is so, because all her despicable calumny is nothing else
than impotent blows to defend herself, typical English weapons, exactly
on a par with the senseless confinement of civilians and the fierce
reprisals upon, the captured submarine crews--because this is so, the
whole matter is contemptible in our eyes and provokes the anger of our
people.
The Lusitania carried _passengers_! In truth we should have been
infinitely better
* * * * *
gesehen, wenn das Schiff, das schon seit vielen Monaten dem Feind von
Nutzen ist und uns Schaden bringt, hätte vernichtet werden können, ohne
dass diese Katastrophe für seine Fahrgäste hätte kommen müssen. Aber
müssen wir uns, denen der Feind das Messer in die Kehle stossen will,
wir, deren _Bezwingung durch den Hunger_ und den Mangel an Kriegsgerät
so ziemlich alle Welt mit Ruhe als ein unvermeidliches Schicksal
mitansehen würde, _müssen_ wir uns nicht mit aller Kraft und mit allen
Mitteln, die der deutsche Geist erfinden kann und die die Ehre des
deutschen Volkes als achtbare Waffen anerkennt, gegen diese furchtbare
Gefahr wehren, die uns noch immer bedroht? Haben nicht gerade sie den
Kampf bis aufs Messer gepredigt und durch ihre Blockade eröffnet, die
jetzt zetern, weil die deutschen Waffen die besseren sind? Oder haben
jene ein Recht, _uns_ anzuklagen, die ihre
* * * * *
pleased if the ship, which for many months past has been of aid to the
enemy and has done us harm, could have been destroyed without the
necessity of this catastrophe befalling its passengers. But must we not,
we whose throat the enemy is seeking to cut, we whose _defeat by hunger_
and by lack of war material nearly every one would witness complacently
as an unavoidable fate, _must_ we not defend ourselves from this
dreadful danger, which still threatens us, with all our might and with
all the means that the German spirit can invent and which the honor of
the German people recognizes as legitimate weapons? Were not those who
now raise outcries because the German weapons are better than their own
the very ones who proclaimed war to the knife and opened it with their
blockade? Or have they a right to accuse _us_, those who allowed their
friends and relatives to entrust themselves to a ship
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account