The machinery of the mindFirth, Violet M. (Violet Mary)
Science
The machinery of the mind
Firth, Violet M. (Violet Mary)
Psychology
We have already considered the mind as a tank divided into compartments
by sieves of varying diameters of mesh, let us now consider the
currents that move in the water that fills the tank. We may
diagrammatically conceive the inflow as taking place through one main
channel into the subconscious, and there dividing into three streams.
This main channel of energy, which supplies the motive power of all
living creatures, has been called by many names: libido, horme, élan
vitale, and bio-urge; an adequate English equivalent is the thrust of
life.
This stream of psychic energy becomes specialised in the individual
into divergent currents, which we call the three great instincts. The
first of these is the SELF-PRESERVATION INSTINCT. Under this heading
may be gathered up all the activities which are motived by (1) the Will
to Live, or Self-Maintenance, and, (2) the Will to Live more Fully, or
Self-Aggrandisement.
The second great instinct is that of REPRODUCTION, or SEX, whose
function it is to secure race preservation. Through this channel
tends to go the surplus of energy left over after the demands of
self-maintenance have been fulfilled.
The third great instinct is the SOCIAL or HERD INSTINCT, by which term
we designate that system of innate tendencies and capacities which
enables us to co-operate with our fellows and lead a social life, with
all its advantages and disadvantages.
Some animals, however, do not have this third instinct, but lead
solitary lives, acknowledging no ties save those of mate and offspring;
but the more highly evolved types, including man, have developed this
great specialisation of psychic energy which enables them to lead a
social life.
These three great instincts act and react on each other in the hidden
field of subconscious, and build up social organisation and individual
character.
In order to understand the workings of the instincts, however, it must
be clearly realised that they are universal and not personal in their
scope; the survival or suffering of the unit are not considered in the
scheme of things, it is the race that counts.
If we regard the instincts as subserving the welfare of the individual
only, we form a concept which cannot fail to lead us astray when we
seek to put our conclusions to a practical application. The workings of
instinct must be viewed from the standpoint of evolutionary progress,
not individual well-being. This is the point of view from which Nature
frames her schemes, and we can only hope to understand her ways if we
occupy her standpoint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account