The magazine of history with notes and queries (Vol. I, No. 1, January 1905)Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries (Vol. I, No. 1, January 1905)
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
Let us briefly consider the subject. On the colonial history of the
Southern States, it is unnecessary to dwell. Suffice it to say, that
while thoroughly imbued with the spirit of independence and taking a
leading part in the struggle of 1776, in this course the South was
actuated by a desire to assert its abstract rights, and to stand loyally
by its sister colonies of the North, rather than by any personal
grievance, or feeling of animosity towards the Mother Country.
Between the Southern States themselves, there were strongly marked
differences, each possessing its own distinctly individual character.
But in essentials, the family likeness between them was strong enough to
make any one member of the group a typical representative of the whole,
so far as the outside world was concerned. Bound indissolubly together
by that common bond,—the institution of slavery,—in politics they were
equally united. From those early days when the American Government was
in its formative stage, down to the period of the Civil War in 1861, the
South stood always a solid unit for republican principles as imbodied in
the Constitution of the United States, and exemplified in the cardinal
Southern doctrine of “States’ Rights.”
The term “democracy” as applied to the South is a total misnomer, and
its application furnishes one of the many curious anomalies to be found
in American political history. But this history is too tangled a skein
to be unravelled here. Enough to say that the Old South was never a
democracy, properly so called; on the contrary, it was an oligarchy of
the most pronounced and exclusive type, its population being sharply
divided into two classes, patrician and plebeian—the governing and the
governed. Nay more, although nominally the entire white population
belonged in the first category (and was therefore eligible for public
office), practically the franchise was confined to the educated and
property-holding class alone, the “poor whites” of the South being too
numerically weak and insignificant to be an appreciable power in
politics.
Thus it came about that, from first to last, in this fundamental
particular the South differed from every other section of the Republic;
and this difference was the direct result of the Institution of Slavery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account