The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. I, No. 4, April 1905Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. I, No. 4, April 1905
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
All are now relegated to the background of “history,” to be
studied in the cold _chiaro-oscuro_ of the past. And the men who led the
forces marshaled against each other in those great conflicts.—Ah, “there
were giants in those days!” Yes, but to their contemporaries they were
merely politicians, too often opprobriously dubbed “political
tricksters,” or even “traitors to their country.” What a lot of truth
there is in the late Thomas B. Reed’s cynicism: “A statesman is a dead
politician.”
The lust for power is one of the deepest instincts of the human mind.
Civilization has not quenched it, but has merely directed it into new
channels. Instead of the savage chieftain who once impressed his will on
his fellow-tribesmen by tomahawk or flint-tipped arrow-head, or by
terrifying shamanism, we have the statesman—“politician,” if you
will—exercising his mastery by all the subtle arts which a keen
intellect and a profound knowledge of men and the influences to which
they are severally and collectively subject, can devise. Here is a
splendid field for the orator, to persuade by his burning eloquence; for
the leader, to show his mastery over men; for the partisan, to cajole
with the promise of sordid spoil, or to threaten the recreant with loss
of influence. There is a glorious zest in this pursuit of power, in this
forging to the front as a leader of men. Admirable ambition, if inspired
by worthy motives. Fascinating, most attractive, to every virile man.
What wonder, if in this eager thirst for eminence among his fellows, the
ardent leader becomes oblivious at times to the relative rights of meum
and tuum? Success is his aim. He _must_ win. The future of his party,
the welfare of his country, demands it. No time to palter over finical
questions of what is proper, of what is right. “The end justifies the
means.” Ah, facilis est descensus Averni, indeed.
All this by way of preliminary to a few gleanings from some old records
of New Jersey, illustrating “past politics” principally in the days of
that erstwhile Royal Province, under that unique Chief Executive, Lord
Cornbury, who was foisted on the people by his amiable cousin, Queen
Anne, doubtless glad enough of the chance to banish him by an ocean’s
broad expanse from her Court. For a score of years New Jersey had been
divided into two Provinces—East Jersey, largely controlled by the Scotch
proprietors and their settlers; and West Jersey, dominated by the
outwardly meek but inwardly determined Quakers. When the two Provinces
were reunited into one—New Jersey—the profligate courtier, the ruffling
gallant, the soldier of doubtful reputation, Lord Cornbury, of all men
was chosen as the solvent to blend these and all the other antagonistic
elements in the Province into one harmonious whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account