The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 5, November 1905Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 5, November 1905
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
In this case the attempt of the upper house to destroy the liberty of
the press, was opposed by the desire of the lower house to uphold it,
and the fact that this occurred on the eve of the Revolution is
significant, teaching us that even to the last the principle that the
press must be free had not been established in the American colonies.
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSION
We have had brought before us all the instances of any importance,
throughout the American colonies of efforts on the part of the
government to control the liberty of the press. Let us now attempt to
deduce from them the general principles which governed the matter.
In the first place it is clear that, as the several colonies differed
the one from another in their relations with and dependence upon the
home government and their Governor, who represented that government, so
too the press was in some colonies far more free from control than in
others. In Massachusetts, where interference from outside was always
resisted, control by the Governor was seldom attempted. Before the
administration of Governor Andros the Crown made no attempt to
interfere; Andros himself appointed Edward Randolph (vide p. 9) as
licenser, and Bartholomew Green, the Boston publisher testifies (vide p.
10) to the fact that in his time (the end of the seventeenth century),
Lieutenant-Governor Stoughton took a keen interest in the productions of
the press, and refused to allow any publications without a previous
application to him, with a copy of the matter to be published. After
this period the control by the Crown again was lost in that as also in
political matters.
In Pennsylvania we have an instance of a Governor representing an
individual proprietor. Here the struggle between the people and Penn’s
representative in political matters was carried over into the field
occupied by the press, and so we find in the early period of the
existence of the press a dual authority exercised, the Crown and the
Quarterly Meeting, both claiming the right of censorship (vide p. 23).
In the first half of the eighteenth century the power of the Quakers
passed away as far as our subject is concerned, but the control
exercised by the Crown continued, although more and more questioned,
until the breaking out of the Revolutionary struggle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account