Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- History -- 1775-1865 -- Fiction
But the heart of her anger was Cornelia--"but for that girl," Rem
would have married Mary Damer, and his home in Boston might have been
full of opportunities for her, as well as a desirable change when she
wearied of New York. Altogether it was a hard thing for her, as well as
a dreadful sorrow for Rem; and she could not think of Cornelia without
anger, "Just for her," she kept saying as she dressed herself with an
elaborate simplicity, "Just for her! Very much she intruded herself
into my affairs; my marriage was her opportunity with Lord Hyde, and
now all she can do is to break up poor Rem's marriage."
When Cornelia entered the Van Ariens parlour Arenta was already there.
She was dressed in a gown of the blackest and softest bombazine and
crape. It had a distinguishing want of all ornament, but it was for
that reason singularly effective against her delicate complexion and
pale golden hair. She looked offended, and hardly spoke to her old
friend, but Cornelia was prepared for some exhibition of anger. She had
not been to see Arenta for a whole week, and she did not doubt she had
been well aware of something unusual in progress. But that Rem had
accused himself did not occur to her; therefore she was hardly prepared
for the passionate accusations with which Arenta assailed her.
"I think," she said, "you have behaved disgracefully to poor Rem! You
would not have him yourself, and yet you prevent another girl--whom he
loves far better than ever he loved you--from marrying him. He has gone
away 'out of the world,' he says, and indeed I should not wonder if he
kills himself. It is most certain you have done all you can to drive
him to it."
"Arenta! I have no idea what you mean. I have not seen Rem, nor written
to Rem, for more than two years."
"Very likely, but you have written about him. You wrote to Miss Darner,
and told her Rem purposely kept a letter, which you had sent to Lord
Hyde."
"I did not write to Miss Damer. I do not know the lady. But Rem DID
keep a letter that belonged to Lord Hyde."
Then anger gave falsehood the bit and she answered, "Rem did NOT keep
any letter that belonged to Lord Hyde. Prove that he did so, before you
accuse him. You cannot."
"I unfortunately directed Lord Hyde's letter to Rem, and Rem's letter
to Lord Hyde. Rem knew that he had Lord Hyde's letter, and he should
have taken it at once to him."
"Lord Hyde had Rem's letter; he ought to have taken it at once to Rem."
"There was not a word in Rem's letter to identify it as belonging to
him."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account