The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad
History
The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company; Railway mail service -- United States
"Out of 27,000 stations supplied by messenger service 7,000 are
paid for by the Department at a cost of between $1,000,000 and
$1,100,000 per annum, leaving the other 20,000 stations to be
supplied by and at the expense of the railroads."
Investigation has shown that on mail routes, where the average mail
pay of the railroad company is $900 a year, the average cost of this
mail messenger service is $400, calculating only $100 as the expense
for each station where they are required to perform the service.
There are instances where the company pays in cash each year, for
delivering the mails between station and post office, considerably
more than the Government pays for the entire mail service over its
line of road. There is no such feature in the express service.
WHY DO RAILROADS CARRY THE MAILS WITHOUT PROFIT?
The question is sometimes asked why the railroads continue to carry
the mails if there is no profit in the business. Carrying the mails is
not the only traffic which railroads take upon terms that would
bankrupt them if applied to all their business.
There is no profit in running passenger trains on most railroads; that
is, the receipts from all the traffic carried on passenger trains are
not sufficient to pay a train mileage or car mileage share of
operating expenses and taxes and charges for the use of capital. But a
large part of this cost of conducting the business of a railroad, such
as taxes, interest, maintenance of roadway, general office expenses,
and many others, would continue substantially the same if the
passenger trains were discontinued. Having the railroad, and its
taxes, and interest, and maintenance expenses to meet, anyhow, no
railroad can afford to refuse any income from passenger trains that
amounts to more than their train operating cost. On the same principle
they accept low rates per mile as a share of through passenger fares
which, if applied to all passenger fares, would show a loss. The road
is there, the trains are running, and the cars only partially loaded;
the addition of through passengers may not materially increase the
expense, and the road is better off to accept the business at less
than the average cost, rather than to reject it. But whatever the
passenger trains lose must be made up by the freight trains if the
road is to continue in business.
The constant aim of the managers of the railroad is to secure from
each class of traffic not only the operating cost peculiar to that
traffic, but a proportion of the general cost; but business is not
necessarily rejected on which it is impossible to secure such
proportion.
Many of the reasons which impel them to run passenger trains without
profit apply to their acceptance of the Government mails. They
facilitate the freight business; it is better to carry them at a loss
than not to carry them at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account