England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Journalists -- Fiction
He remembered as he spoke that Hillier didn’t, and James Peters didn’t
much. But surely the Dean wouldn’t be found on any point in agreement
with Hillier, or even with the cheery, unthinking Peters, innocent of
the Higher Criticism. Perhaps it might be diplomatic to tell the Dean
that these two young clergymen didn’t much like Eileen Le Moine.
While Eddy ruminated on this question, they reached the Hall. The Hall
was that type of hall they erected in the days of our earlier Georges;
it had risen on the site of an Elizabethan house belonging to the same
family. This is mentioned in order to indicate that the Bellairs’ had
long been of solid worth in the country. In themselves, they were
pleasant, hospitable, clean-bred, active people, of a certain charm,
which those susceptible to all kinds of charm, like Eddy, felt keenly.
Finally, none of them were clever, all of them were nicely dressed, and
most of them were on the lawn, hitting at a captive golf-ball, which was
one of the many things they did well, though it is at best an
unsatisfactory occupation, achieving little in the way of showy
results. They left it readily to welcome Eddy and Daphne.
Dick (the Guards) said, “Hullo, old man, home for Christmas? Good for
you. Come and shoot on Wednesday, will you? Not a parson yet, then?”
Daphne said, “He’s off that just now.”
Eddy said, “I’m going on a paper for the present.”
Claude (Magdalen) said, “A _what_? What a funny game! Shall you have to
go to weddings and sit at the back and write about the bride’s clothes?
What a rag!”
Nevill (the House of Commons) said, “What paper?” in case it should be
one on the wrong side. It may here be mentioned (what may or may not
have been inferred) that the Bellairs’ belonged to the Conservative
party in the state. Nevill a little suspected Eddy’s soundness in this
matter (though he did not know that Eddy belonged to the Fabian Society
as well as to the Primrose League). Also he knew well the sad fact that
our Liberal organs are largely served by Conservative journalists, and
our great Tory press fed by Radicals from Balliol College, Oxford,
King’s College, Cambridge, and many other less refined homes of
sophistry. This fact Nevill rightly called disgusting. He did not think
these journalists honest or good men. So he asked, “What paper?” rather
suspiciously.
Eddy said, “The _Daily Post_,” which is a Conservative organ, and also
costs a penny, a highly respectable sum, so Nevill was relieved.
“Afraid you might be going on some Radical rag,” he said, quite
superfluously, as it had been obvious he had been afraid of that. “Some
Unionists do. Awfully unprincipled, I call it. I can’t see how they
square it with themselves.”
“I should think quite easily,” said Eddy; but added, to avert an
argument (he had tried arguing with Nevill often, and failed), “But my
paper’s politics won’t touch me. I’m going as literary reviewer,
entirely.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account