England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Journalists -- Fiction
Eddy went round to the rooms in Old Compton Street which he shared with
Arnold Denison. Arnold had chosen Soho for residence partly because he
liked it, partly to improve his knowledge of languages, and partly to
study the taste of the neighbourhood in literature, as it was there that
he intended, when he had more leisure, to start a bookshop. Eddy, too,
liked it. (This is a superfluous observation, because anybody would.) In
fact, he liked his life in general just now. He liked reviewing for the
_Daily Post_ and writing for himself (himself _via_ the editors of
various magazines who met with his productions on their circular route
and pushed them on again). He liked getting review copies of books to
keep; his taste was catholic and omnivorous, and boggled at nothing.
With joy he perused everything, even novels which had won prizes in
novel competitions, popular discursive works called “About the Place,”
and books of verse (to do them justice, not even popular) called
“Pipings,” and such. He wrote appreciative reviews of all of them,
because he appreciated them all. It may fairly be said that he saw each
as its producer saw it, which may or may not be what a reviewer should
try to do, but is anyhow grateful and comforting to the reviewed.
Arnold, who did not do this, in vain protested that he would lose his
job soon. “No literary editor will stand such indiscriminate fulsomeness
for long.... It’s a dispensation of providence that you didn’t come and
read for us, as I once mistakenly wished. You would, so far as your
advice carried any weight, have dragged us down into the gutter. Have
you no sense of values or of decency? Can you really like these florid
effusions of base minds?” He was reading through Eddy’s last review,
which was of a book of verse by a lady gifted with emotional tendencies
and an admiration for landscape. Arnold shook his head and laughed as he
put the review down.
“The queer thing about it is that it’s not a bad review, in spite of
everything you say in appreciation of the lunatic who wrote the book.
That’s what I can’t understand; how you can be so intelligent and yet
so idiotic. You’ve given the book exactly, in a few phrases--no one
could possibly mistake its nature--and then you make several quite true,
not to say brilliant remarks about it--and then you go on and say how
good it is.... Well, I shall be interested to see how long they keep you
on.”
“They like me,” Eddy assured him, complacently. “They think I write
well. The authors like me, too. Many a heartfelt letter of thanks do I
get from those whom there are few to praise and fewer still to love. As
you may have noticed, they strew the breakfast table. Is it _comme il
faut_ for me to answer? I do--I mean, I did, both times--because it
seemed politer, but it was perhaps a mistake, because the correspondence
between me and one of them has not ceased yet, and possibly never will,
since neither of us likes to end it. How involving life is!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account