From this the kind of work performed by natural selection should be
obvious. Natural selection does not make new species. These make
themselves, or, rather, originate in accordance with the laws of
variation.
“You can,” runs an old proverb, “bring a horse to the drinking fountain,
but you cannot make him drink.” You may be able to bring a child into the
world, but you cannot secure its survival. Variation brings into being
mutants, which are incipient species, but variation cannot determine
their survival. It is at this stage that natural selection steps in.
But because natural selection allows certain mutations to persist, it is
not correct to say that natural selection has caused these mutations or
made or originated the species to which they give rise.
The Civil Service Commissioners do not make Indian civil servants: they
merely determine which of a number of ready-made men shall become civil
servants. Similarly, natural selection does not make new species, it
simply decides which of a number of ready-made organisms shall survive
and establish themselves as new species. Nor does natural selection
always do as much as this; for it is not the only determinant of
survival. Its position is sometimes comparable to that of the Medical
Board which inspects and rejects the physically unfit of the candidates
which have already been selected by some other authority.
The examination conducted by natural selection may be compared to a
competitive one. A separate, independent examination is held for each
particular locality; consequently the severity of the competition will
vary with the locality.
In each competition some candidates pass with ease: they gain an
unnecessarily high total of marks. So in nature do certain organisms, as,
for example, the Leaf-butterflies (_Kallimas_), appear to be over-adapted
to their environment. Other candidates manage to pass only by a very
narrow margin: these are paralleled in nature by those species which are
barely able to maintain themselves, which become extinct the moment the
competition increases in severity.
The great bulk of the candidates fail to obtain sufficient marks to gain
a place among the chosen few; these unsuccessful candidates correspond to
the mutating forms which perish in the struggle for existence, to those
individuals which happen to have mutated in unfavourable directions.
Even as many candidates have acquired knowledge of subjects in which they
are not examined, so do many organisms possess characteristics which are
of no utility to them in the struggle for existence.
Wallaceians expend much time and energy in misguided attempts to explain
the existence of such characters in terms of natural selection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account