Not till she was alone in her room that night did Stephen dare to let her
thoughts run freely. In the darkness her mind began to work truly, so
truly that she began at the first step of logical process: to study
facts. And to study them she must question till she found motive.
Why had Harold sent her the letter? His own words said that it should be
in her hands. Then, again, he said it might comfort her to know the
letter was safe. How could it comfort her? How did he get possession of
the letter?
There she began to understand; her quick intuition and her old knowledge
of Harold's character and her new knowledge of Leonard's, helped her to
reconstruct causes. In his interview with her he had admitted that
Leonard had told him much, all. He would no doubt have refused to
believe him, and Leonard would have shown him, as proof, her letter
asking him to meet her. He would have seen then, as she did now, how
much the possession of that letter might mean to any one.
Good God! to 'any one.' Could it have been so to Harold himself . . .
that he thought to use it as an engine, to force her to meet his
wishes--as Leonard had already tried to do! The mistrust, founded on her
fear, was not dead yet . . . No! no! no! Her whole being resented such a
monstrous proposition! Besides, there was proof. Thank God! there was
proof. A blackmailer would have stayed close to her, and would have kept
the letter; Harold did neither. Her recognition of the truth was shown
in her act, when, stretching out her arms in the darkness, she whispered
pleadingly:
'Forgive me, Harold!'
And Harold, far away where the setting sun was lying red on the rim of
the western sea, could not hear her. But perhaps God did.
As, then, Harold's motive was not of the basest, it must have been of the
noblest. What would be a man's noblest motive under such circumstances?
Surely self-sacrifice!
And yet there could be no doubt as to Harold's earnestness when he had
told her that he loved her . . .
Here Stephen covered her face in one moment of rapture. But the gloom
that followed was darker than the night. She did not pursue the thought.
That would come later when she should understand.
And yet, so little do we poor mortals know the verities of things, so
blind are we to things thrust before our eyes, that she understood more
in that moment of ecstasy than in all the reasoning that preceded and
followed it. But the reasoning went on:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account