The man in the street: Papers on American topicsNicholson, Meredith
General
The man in the street: Papers on American topics
Nicholson, Meredith
American essays -- 20th century
Smith, as I was saying, had refrained from participating in our talk
on that August night where the saltless sea complained upon the beach
and the pines took counsel of the stars. Then, as the party broke up,
Smith flung his cigar into Lake Michigan and closed the discussion by
remarking with a despairing sigh--
“Well, either way, the people lose!”
I
Smith prides himself on his ability to get what he wants when he wants
it--in everything but politics. In all else that pertains to his
welfare Smith is informed, capable, and efficient. In his own affairs
he tells the other fellow where to get off, and if told he can’t do
a thing he proceeds at once to do it and to do it well. It is only
in politics that his efforts are futile and he takes what is “handed
him.” Under strong provocation he will, in the manner of a dog in the
highway, run barking after some vehicle that awakens his ire; but
finding himself unequal to the race, he meekly trots back to his own
front yard. If the steam roller runs over him and the self-respect is
all but mashed out of him, he picks himself up and retires to consider
it yet again. He has learned nothing, except that by interposing
himself before a machine of superior size and weight he is very likely
to get hurt; and this he knew before.
Smith and I are in the north woods thirty-five miles from a telegraph
instrument, where it is possible to ponder great questions with a
degree of detachment. Loafing with Smith is one of the most profitable
things I do; he is the best of fellows, and, as our lives have run
parallel from school-days with an unbroken intimacy, we are thoroughly
familiar with each other’s manner of thought. What I am setting down
here is really a condensed report of our talks. Just where Smith leaves
off and I begin doesn’t matter, for we speak the same language of the
Ancient Brotherhood of the Average Man. Smith is a Republican; I am a
Democrat. We have “gone to the mat” in many campaigns, each valiantly
defending his party and its heroes. But, chumming together in August,
1920, the punch had gone out of us. We talked of men and issues, but
not with our old fervor. At first we were both shy of present-day
matters, and disposed to “sidle up” to the immediate situation--to
reach it by reluctant, tangential approaches, as though we were
strangers, wary of wounding each other’s feelings.
We mean to keep smiling about this whole business. We Americans seem
destined to rock dizzily on the brink of many precipices without ever
quite toppling over. We have lived through wars and rumors of wars, and
have escaped pestilence and famine, and we are deeply grateful that the
present campaign lays so light a tax upon the emotions. The republic
isn’t going to perish, no matter who’s elected. One thing is certain,
however, and that is that this time we--that is, Smith and I--are not
going to be jostled or pushed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account