In the early part of 1711, an old man, bowed by adversity still more
than by weight of years, his countenance furrowed by deep wrinkles,
his eyesight nearly gone, might be seen every morning to leave a little
house in the Rue Férou, where he dwelt with his interpreter.[326]
Having preserved in his attire some remnant of the Armenian costume,
being a foreigner in language and manners, and sustaining by the aid of
a stick his enfeebled body, he attracted attention, and people followed
him with their glances to the church of Saint-Sulpice, to which he
was attached as priest, and where he every day said mass.[327] This
was the religious chief and civil protector of several millions of
Armenians, the enemy of Ferriol and of the Jesuits, and the vanquished
in the long struggle sustained against them. He did not long enjoy his
liberty, but died on July 21, 1711, ten months after having quitted the
Bastille, without relations or friends, having demanded and received
the consolations and the sacraments of that Roman Church[328] whose
ardent missionaries had been the cause of all his misfortunes. Thus
terminated this life, commenced in obscurity and misery, continued on
the patriarchal throne, crossed with unhoped-for elevations and sudden
falls, and completed mournfully in exile.
Louis XIV., exhausting precautions, and pushing imposture and mockery
to their extreme limits, had an instrument drawn up by the Lieutenant
of Police d’Argenson, in which were attested the King’s sorrow on
hearing of this death, and _the promptitude which the monarch had
shown_ _in giving liberty to the prisoner directly the foreigner had
been able to make it understood what his quality was_. By a singular
euphemism, Avedick was termed a _disgracié_, and Louis XIV. declared
that _he had never approved the violence, and still less the crimes,
which, unknown to his Majesty, had been committed in Turkey on the
person of the deceased_.[329] This lying document was to have been
sent to Constantinople in case the Porte should reclaim Avedick in too
menacing a manner. But it was unnecessary. Several changes of Grand
Viziers contributed to abate the demands, and to render them less
pressing. At long intervals the name of the ex-Patriarch recurred in
the conversations between the Ottoman prime minister and the French
ambassador;[330] then, by degrees, the Divan no longer occupied itself
with it. The remembrance of Avedick was less profoundly engrafted there
than in the grateful hearts of the Armenians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account