The Manual of the Botany of the Northern United States: Including the District East of the Mississippi and North of North Carolina and TennesseeGray, Asa
Science
The Manual of the Botany of the Northern United States: Including the District East of the Mississippi and North of North Carolina and Tennessee
Gray, Asa
Plants -- United States
GEOGRAPHICAL LIMITS, AND DISTRIBUTION.--The southern limit of the
territory covered by the present work is the same as in the later
previous editions, viz. the southern boundary of Virginia and Kentucky.
This coincides better than any other geographical line with the natural
division between the cooler-temperate and the warm-temperate vegetation
of the Atlantic States. The rapid increase of population west of the
Mississippi River, and the growing need of a Manual covering the flora
of that section, have seemed a sufficient reason for the extension of
the limits of the work westward to the 100th meridian, thus connecting
with the _Manual of the Flora of the Rocky Mountain Region_ by Prof.
Coulter. These limits, as well as that upon the north, have been in
general strictly observed, very few species being admitted that are not
known with some degree of certainty to occur within them. The extreme
western flora is no doubt imperfectly represented.
The distribution of the individual species is indicated somewhat more
definitely than heretofore in many cases, so far as it could be
satisfactorily ascertained. The extralimital range is also sometimes
given, but the terms "northward," "southward," and "westward" are more
frequently employed, signifying an indefinite range in those directions
beyond the limits of the Manual. Where no definite habitat is specified,
the species may be understood as found more or less generally throughout
the whole area, or at least to near the western limits.
NOMENCLATURE, ACCENTUATION OF NAMES, etc.--In case of question
respecting the proper name to be adopted for any species, Dr. Gray's
known and expressed views have been followed, it is believed, throughout
the work. While reasonable regard has been paid to the claims of
priority, the purpose has been to avoid unnecessary changes, in the
belief that such changes are in most cases an unmitigated evil. Synonyms
are rarely given except where changes have been made. As a guide to
correct pronunciation, the long sound of the accented vowel (modified
often in personal names) is indicated, as heretofore, by the grave
accent (`), and the short sound by the acute (´). In regard to the
derivations of generic names, many valuable suggestions have been due to
W. R. Gerard, Esq., of New York.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account