For a good quarter of an hour, the captive clambers up the sides of the
bell-glass, crawls down again and up again, seeking an outlet whereby
to escape, and seems to pay no attention to the game. I was already
despairing of success when suddenly the huntress falls upon the larva,
turns it over, belly upwards, clasps it and stings it thrice in
succession in the thorax, particularly under the neck, in the median
region, a point at which the sting is more insistent than elsewhere.
The close-clasped larva does its utmost to protest, emptying its
scent-bottles and oiling itself with petrol; but these defensive
tactics have no effect. Indifferent to the heady perfume, the Odynerus
performs her operation, wielding her lancet with the same certainty as
if the patient were scentless. Thrice the sting is driven in, to kill
the motor nerves in the three ganglia of the thorax. I repeat the
experiment with other subjects. Few refuse to attack the prey; and each
time three stings are administered with marked insistence at the point
under the neck. What I saw under artificial conditions Claire, on her
side, saw under conditions of liberty, in the open air, on the leaves
of the transplanted poplar. The two collaborators, she and I, arrived
at precisely the same result.
The operation is rapidly performed. Then the Odynerus, while dragging
her prey along, belly to belly, munches at its neck for a considerable
time, but without causing any wound. This action may well be equivalent
to the practice of the Languedocian Sphex and the Hairy Ammophila, [61]
when, without inflicting a bruise, the one nibbles at the neck of her
Ephippiger and the other at that of her Grey Worm, in order to compress
and paralyse the cervical ganglia. I of course take possession of the
torpid larvæ. The victim is absolutely inert, save for a slight
quivering of the legs, which soon ceases. When laid upon its back, the
larva no longer stirs. It is not dead, however; that I have been able
to prove. Its dull vitality is affirmed in another manner. During the
first few days of this lethargy which knows no awakening, droppings are
ejected until the intestine is empty.
On renewing my experiments, I witness something so singular that I am
at first baffled. This time the prey is seized by the anal extremity
and the sting is driven several times into the last segments,
underneath the abdomen. This is the usual operation reversed and
performed upon the hinder segments, instead of those of the thorax. The
surgeon and the patient, who are head to head in the normal method, are
in the present instance head to tail. Can it be by inadvertence that
the operator is confusing the two ends of the grub and stinging the tip
of the abdomen under the impression that she is stinging the neck? I
believe it for a moment, but am soon undeceived. Instinct does not make
mistakes of this sort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account