The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Taxes were imposed upon no regular plan, and whatever arrangement was
made, it was liable to be broken through by the “good pleasure” of
the king. This was especially the case in the reign of Francis I.,
whose subjects, when groaning under oppressive charges of _tailles_,
_taillons_, _aides_, _subsides_, _impôts_, and _gabelle_, looked back
and longed for the good old times of Louis XII. Francis squandered
his income in the most reckless manner; every body plundered the
national exchequer, especially his favorites and mistresses. So great
were the expenses of the marriage (the _nôces salées_) of his niece
Joan of Albret with the Duke of Cleves in 1541, that to make up the
deficiency he not only extended the gabelle or salt tax to several
of the southern provinces, but doubled it in those where it already
existed, expecting that the returns would be doubled also. In this
he was disappointed, and new sources of revenue had to be invented.
The coinage was debased, raising the value of the silver mark from
£165 to £185;[178] a multitude of offices was created, all to be had
for money; judgeships were made venal, lotteries were established,
additional _décimes_ imposed on the clergy;[179] the churches were
robbed of their ornaments of gold, silver, and precious gems;[180]
loans were raised by means of _rentes_ or stock offered for sale at
the Hotel-de-Ville of Paris, and the citizens were expected to become
purchasers. Eightscore thousand crowns were thus borrowed _au denier
douze_; that is to say, at 8⅓ per cent. The superintendents of finance
were bound to procure money, even if they had to borrow it on their own
security; and, when all other means failed, and a large sum was wanted
instantly for some royal caprice or some new mistress, a financier
was hanged and his property confiscated. Such measures necessarily
discontented every body and profited none but a few persons at court;
yet by some means or other Francis I. contrived to leave four millions
of livres in the treasury, which Henry II., aided by Diana of Poitiers,
soon squandered. The new king took one important step toward financial
accountability by dividing the kingdom into seventeen généralités,
each of which was farmed at a very high rate.[181] Under his two
successors, the government speculated in French vanity by making titles
of nobility purchasable. Pasquier thought this an “inexhaustible source
of supply,” but it does not appear to have made any large return to
the treasury. The “deficit” became periodical, and to fill up the gulf
the taxes (especially the gabelle) were augmented,[182] financiers
were prosecuted and heavily mulcted, many useless offices were created
on purpose to be sold, and new loans were contracted. Among other
devices--all of them very startling to a modern chancellor of the
exchequer--was a proposal to appoint 13,000 sergens, or baillies.
Pasquier hopes this will not be done, for “it would eclipse the memory
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account