The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
of the 11,000 devils spoken of in the time of our grandfathers.”
The taxation fell very heavily on the Tiers état, and particularly
upon the agricultural classes. The towns-people, the bourgeoisie,
were to some degree protected by charters and privileges, and had an
organization of their own by which the taxes were levied. They were
exempt from foreign garrisons, elected their own officers (with the
exception of the provost of the merchants), enrolled a citizen guard,
and had the right to barricade the streets and shut their gates,
even against the king.[183] No charters or securities guaranteed the
peasant from injustice. Michieli, writing in 1561, describes the
oppression in some provinces (especially in Normandy and Picardy)
as so excessive, that the peasantry were forced to abandon the
country.[184] The burdens were the more severe and invidious, that
while the seigneurs mercilessly exacted their rents, dues, corvées,
customs, etc., they contributed nothing to the state beyond what
they gave of their free-will as a gift. Clergy, nobility, soldiers,
members of the king’s household, and of the high courts of parliament,
school-masters, officers of finance, free cities (villes de franchise)
like Paris, and noble cities (villes nobles) like Troyes, were all
exempt; not that they did not contribute to the revenue, but only
so much as they chose to assess themselves. In the reign of Francis
I. the French clergy, with the consent of the pope, agreed to pay a
_décime_, or one-tenth of their revenue, which in the next reign
was doubled. At Poissy, in 1561, they entered into an arrangement to
pay sixteen hundred thousand livres annually, on condition of their
future exemption from all other taxes. Considering that they possessed
about one-third of the landed and house-property in France, this was
but a small contribution to the necessities of the crown. The yearly
rental of the whole kingdom has been estimated, on what are indeed very
vague data, to have amounted to fifteen millions of crowns, of which
six belonged to the clergy[185] and one and a half to the king. The
exports of corn, wine, salt, and wood were valued at twelve millions of
francs, more than Spain received from her mines of Mexico and Peru.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account