The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
In the last sitting of the Estates the Abbot of Bois Aubry, secretary
of the Clergy in the preparation of their cahier, strongly condemned
the use of force in religious matters. “The conscience,” he said,
“suffers no one to command it but reason; and therefore to desire in
our days to deprive the followers of the pretended Reformed religion
of the exercise of their reason can produce nothing but evil. It would
be driving them to atheism;--a thing which every good Catholic should
hold in horror and execration.... It is only by means of a Council
that we can remedy the evil of religious diversity now among us, and
not by the sword or the gibbet. Nine royal edicts were issued during
the former reigns, and the courts of Parliament have published decrees
without number, in order to abolish this so-called Reformed religion,
by the punishment of fire and other severe pains and penalties. They
omitted nothing to prevent its growth, and did not succeed. Our Holy
Father (it is said) will never consent to permit the exercise of their
religion; but what answer would he make if any one should ask him why
he allows the Jews the exercise of their religion at Rome and Avignon,
and in all the States of the Church? Would he say that the religion of
the Jews, who do not believe in Christ, is better than the religion of
those who do believe in him?”
The Estates separated without settling any thing: they did nothing
toward reconciling the two religious parties or relieving the finances
of the kingdom. They called for the redress of many grievances; and
when the court would have been willing to concede a few reforms
in exchange for pecuniary supplies, the Estates said that their
instructions, which they could not exceed, gave them no power or
authority to raise money. They thus virtually threw away “the keys of
the purse”--the most potent guarantee of good government. It was a
fatal mistake, but it does not appear that the court observed it any
more than the Estates. The government saw only that the States-General
was a body too numerous for the dispatch of business, and it was agreed
that the provincial Estates, grouped into thirteen assemblies, should
each elect three deputies, and that the thirty-nine thus returned
should meet in the following August. The bishops were also convoked to
this assembly, and a great number of them actually obeyed the summons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account