The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
It was impossible that such “lynch-law” violence could have any
permanent repressive effect upon men who felt that “persecution was the
ladder by which they were to reach heaven.”[261] The Huguenot was not
likely to be less fervent than the Mahometan, who looks upon the sword
of his enemy as the key to Paradise.
There were perhaps few cities where the magistrates showed so much good
sense as at Amiens in adopting vigorous measures to preserve peace
between both religious parties. About four years before this time
the heretics in that city were estimated at 500, a body too numerous
to be openly molested. The monks, therefore, organized processions
of children between the ages of eight and twelve, and these to the
number of 200 paraded the streets at night with toy crosses and
banners, halting from time to time and singing the _Ave Maria_
at certain doors, according as their leader, a man bearing a sword,
directed them: “Sing, children, sing, in spite of the Huguenots.”
The Jacobin preachers used their pulpits as instruments of sedition,
employing language that could hardly fail to lead to rioting. Indeed
(to anticipate our narrative), on the 7th and 8th of December, 1561,
the tocsin was rung, the Catholics fell upon the Huguenots as they were
returning from divine worship, wounded many, and maltreated some of the
civic officers and others who had come to help the weaker party. It was
in consequence of these and similar outbreaks that the magistrates, in
order to prevent the mere possibility of rioting, interfered so far
with individual liberty as to forbid the inhabitants to assemble in
the streets to the number of more than four, or to leave their houses
after curfew, to carry arms, to discuss the sermons, or to call each
other names, such as “Huguenots, Lutherans, papists, hypocrites, and
caffards,” under pain of death. Still the magistrates were not in the
least inclined to tolerate heterodoxy, for they went on to prohibit
assemblies either in the city or without, for the purpose of preaching,
reading, or psalm-singing, contrary to the practice of the Church.[262]
Although the Catholic party appears to have become stronger in the
municipal body, still their measures inclined to tolerance. On the 22d
May, 1562, the ministers were ordered to leave the city within three
days, and school-masters were forbidden to teach the new doctrine to
their pupils. Five days later we find the Notables assembled to devise
means for compelling some eighteen or twenty Huguenots to decorate
their houses for the procession of the Holy Sacrament, with a view “to
avoid any demonstration of feeling on the part of the people, who would
be scandalized by any want of reverence.” The men were summoned before
them, and consented under protest to adorn their windows. “They pleaded
their conscience,” says the register; “and when they were asked
how that could be wounded by such an act, they refused to give any
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account